Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Celeron G5900 + Pentium Gold G6400 Benchmarks - Low-Price Comet Lake CPUs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • _ob1
    replied
    Great article. I first gave it a tip, THEN it made me subscribe. Keep the great work!

    Leave a comment:


  • leipero
    replied
    To be fair, it's not all that bad for 2c/2t|4t CPUs, but segmentation in instructuin sets etc., and price... (not counting platform price). Those CPUs will be very usable for at least few years from now if not much more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Teggs
    replied
    If you can find a Ryzen 1200 AF or 1600 AF part for MSRP, it will blow out the value scale. The 1600 AF can lead the 3300X in performance in a few cases. Availability and pricing are reported to have wild swings based on where on the planet you are, but it might be worth having a look.

    Leave a comment:


  • caligula
    replied
    Originally posted by t.s. View Post

    Well, there's something about physics limitation. Maybe when we can somehow accelerate creating PC using carbon or organic, then, maybe, there's the jump that you seek.
    Not true. AMD has provided significant speedups for the same price. Intel hasn't. It's pretty obvious if you look at the released products and stock between 2017-2020, or who had to go through some major leadership reorganization just few days ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • t.s.
    replied
    Originally posted by herman View Post

    Exactly this. It's been completely underwhelming. The only scarier thought is if it hadn't been for AMD, then progress would've been even slower.
    Yep. I'm quite certain that the premium i7's still has 4C8T now if not for AMD.

    Leave a comment:


  • t.s.
    replied
    Originally posted by ShFil View Post
    It's scary how slow progress was in last 9 years.

    In 2012 my pc's mb died and had to replace pc. In seven years there was jump from pentium IV prescott to i5 ivy bridge. But now...
    Well, there's something about physics limitation. Maybe when we can somehow accelerate creating PC using carbon or organic, then, maybe, there's the jump that you seek.

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    showed to be a better bet all around than the chaper Celeron G5900

    Leave a comment:


  • herman
    replied
    Originally posted by ShFil View Post
    It's scary how slow progress was in last 9 years.

    In 2012 my pc's mb died and had to replace pc. In seven years there was jump from pentium IV prescott to i5 ivy bridge. But now...
    Exactly this. It's been completely underwhelming. The only scarier thought is if it hadn't been for AMD, then progress would've been even slower.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slartifartblast
    replied
    Poor, file under crap.
    Last edited by Slartifartblast; 30 July 2020, 01:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • willmore
    replied
    It would have been nice to see some tests that point out the segmentation Intel puts into these processors--lack of AVX, etc. Do they still segregate off AESNI? That might be a good thing to test.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X