Maybe check a few more distros with live CDs/flash to see if they do something differently regarding idle. And if you are into custom kernels, maybe eliminate cpufreq and cpuidle susbystems altogether, allowing the cpu to undervolt/underclock on its own based on the loads it detects, rather than having the OS algorithms control it and do something wrong - if they are doing something wrong (?).
+15w compared to windows seem a lot. Personally, on my 2200g (ok not a zen2 obviously), windows are far worse in terms of power consumption at idle.
Btw, regarding power usage on linux, I just discovered by accident that the turbostat program exposes core watts and package watts. However, I think the numbers are probably off by quite a bit. For example on my 2200g I'm idling at ~17w, hitting 67w in prime (on the plug meter)... but turbostat shows 10.18 CorWatts and 18.53 PkgWatts... it may need an adjustment in the variables.
+15w compared to windows seem a lot. Personally, on my 2200g (ok not a zen2 obviously), windows are far worse in terms of power consumption at idle.
Btw, regarding power usage on linux, I just discovered by accident that the turbostat program exposes core watts and package watts. However, I think the numbers are probably off by quite a bit. For example on my 2200g I'm idling at ~17w, hitting 67w in prime (on the plug meter)... but turbostat shows 10.18 CorWatts and 18.53 PkgWatts... it may need an adjustment in the variables.
Comment