If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel DPTF Adaptive Policy Being Reverse Engineered For Better Linux Ultrabook Support
'cause there's PECI (and the EC itself) and it will throttle your beloved ultrabook into oblivion no matter how hard you try to configure MSRs and MMIOs.
Yeah, your big bad x86 CPU is just a coprocessor now. More and more things are becoming out of its control.
Looks quite unfotunate, next time we will have to online authorize for turbo boost ;(
I don't get it, why use DPTF if you can do just tune you intel-rapl-mmio constraints for TDP and boost times? Also there is are intel p_statest for freq and other settings
'cause there's PECI (and the EC itself) and it will throttle your beloved ultrabook into oblivion no matter how hard you try to configure MSRs and MMIOs.
Yeah, your big bad x86 CPU is just a coprocessor now. More and more things are becoming out of its control.
I don't get it, why use DPTF if you can do just tune you intel-rapl-mmio constraints for TDP and boost times? Also there is are intel p_statest for freq and other settings
Intel DPTF Adaptive Policy Being Reverse Engineered For Better Linux Ultrabook Support
Phoronix: Intel DPTF Adaptive Policy Being Reverse Engineered For Better Linux Ultrabook Support
One of the areas of Intel's Linux support that has been less than ideal is their handling of the Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework (DPTF) for today's ultrabook. Intel has provided some support with a focus on Google's Chromium OS but it's less than complete and notably missing is support for the more advanced "adaptive policy", but that soon could change...
Leave a comment: