I have seen comparisons that look like this before. It is what happens when someone benchmarks Bulldozer. Time has washed away the differences between the processors of that period. If 'Bulldozer sucks', then 'Sandy Bridge sucks' too.
What this particular chart does not list is the relative prices of the 8700K and 3600X (or for that matter, the 3600). In a word: 'ouch'.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Sandy Bridge Core i7 3960X Benchmarked Against Today's Six-Core / 12 Thread AMD/Intel CPUs
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Zan Lynx View PostI guess my six core 980X is barely worth running any more. Heh.Last edited by ms178; 14 September 2019, 07:31 AM.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I guess my six core 980X is barely worth running any more. Heh.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darkbasic View PostWow, didn't realize the improvement was that big. Could you please re-test with the processors at the same clock?
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
So architectural improvements make a huge difference it would seem. It's not just pure core count that makes all the difference or even a little bit of clock speed difference. either.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Wow, didn't realize the improvement was that big. Could you please re-test with the processors at the same clock?
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
The Sandy Bridge Core i7 3960X Benchmarked Against Today's Six-Core / 12 Thread AMD/Intel CPUs
Phoronix: The Sandy Bridge Core i7 3960X Benchmarked Against Today's Six-Core / 12 Thread AMD/Intel CPUs
Complementing our recent AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Linux benchmarking, with recently having out the Intel Core i7 3960X Sandy Bridge Extreme Edition, here are benchmarks showing that previous $999 USD six-core / twelve-thread processor compared to today's Ryzen 5 3600X (and previous-generation Ryzen 5 2600X) as well as the Core i7 8700K.
Tags: None
- Likes 2
Leave a comment: