Originally posted by TomasC
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Performance On AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostInteresting - seems the Windows scheduler has dramatically caught up. Still obviously has a lot more work to do. I wonder what's going on with Linux and ffmpeg.
Also, I'm a big fan of the 2nd to last comparison graph, though as a suggestion:
I'd like to see it sorted based on the percentage
It will be interesting to see if MSFT has fixed the scheduler and their NUMA support to something more current.
I read that MSFT had been working on new NUMA support for some multi-package Intel CPU's coming out.
Being Microsoft, they probably decided to do all the NUMA changes at once.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dr. Righteous View PostSo, unless I missed it; this is 18.04 LTS running the "stock" Kernel which should be 4.15 correct? Impressive indeed. I would like to see the results running the latest Linux kernel.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
According to the Solus forums, you can start your benchmarking for that now. They hadn't moved beyond Systemd 239, so they never had the boot issues. Go go gadget 'curated rolling release'. :P
The numbers here seem to be showing what Lisa Su was talking about at Computex. Microsoft actually got off their butts and did some patching to work better with Zen*. I do wonder what was involved in that deal. Apart from the disgusting display on stage where Windows was lauded as a cornerstone of the PC world and other such rot.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Was the test done with the same CPU, or two different CPUs (but still the same model)? The Ryzen 3xxx CPUs seem to have a large individual variance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by F.Ultra View Post
Which I would say is valid part of a comparison between two different systems, especially on a user site like this.
(Or maybe Microsoft C faster than GNU C?)
Leave a comment:
-
Michael, I can't believe it. Please don't use BLAKE2 for cross-OS comparisons, and instead PLEASE do use it in cross-processor ones.
"Cycles Per Byte" means it is supposed to compare processor architectures, NOT operating systems. If the results vary, it's caused by kernel differences or compiler differences (unless the whole program has been written in assembly, which is likely).Last edited by tildearrow; 26 July 2019, 01:35 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: