Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

8-Way Linux Distribution Benchmarks On The Intel Core i9 9900K - One Distro Wins 67% Of The Time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by M@yeulC View Post

    I agree, and that was the reason I didn't read the article. It was clear to me that Clear Linux would be the title, the title would have been waay better making this explicit.
    How about

    One Gaming Console Wins 67% Salles and That Isn't One nor This One or One of Two, But One Who Will Soon Be Above Three
    Last edited by dungeon; 26 October 2018, 05:36 AM.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by mblm View Post
      <i>Processor Details</i>
      <i>Clear Linux 25720: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance</i>

      All other distributions: <i>Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave</i>
      Yes that is each distro's out-of-the-box config.
      Michael Larabel
      https://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #23
        Oh gee I wonder what that distro is

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by zamadatix View Post

          clickbait doesn't have to be false, just has to bait you into going to the article because the wording made it sound interesting.
          That is literally the true purpose of a good headline. Just saying.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by KillYourFM View Post
            That is literally the true purpose of a good headline. Just saying.
            Well Phoronix do benches, so there is a lot of these this VS that expected. So, i wouldn't be surprised if even "Dr. Click-Bait VS Spider-Man" happens here

            Comment


            • #26
              Michael Please add Julia benchmarks, noone needs Octave anymore!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Zyklon View Post
                Michael Please add Julia benchmarks, noone needs Octave anymore!
                Not too familiar with Julia, you'd likely need to point out some benchmarks / test scripts if you want it included in PTS.
                Michael Larabel
                https://www.michaellarabel.com/

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Michael View Post

                  Not too familiar with Julia, you'd likely need to point out some benchmarks / test scripts if you want it included in PTS.
                  My comment was in general that I don’t see a point in doing Octave benchmarks at all, as someone who cares even just a litte bit about performance in scientific computing would never consider Octave in the first place. Even if you run Octave on a dual Xeon machine with terabytes of RAM, Julia on a Raspberry Pie will burn it to the ground with ease. Here are some numbers to compare: https://julialang.org/benchmarks

                  Would really be rad if you’re interested in including Julia benchmarks! Here are some, for example:

                  A collection of Julia benchmarks available for CI tracking from the JuliaLang/julia repository - JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl

                  A benchmarking framework for the Julia language. Contribute to JuliaCI/BenchmarkTools.jl development by creating an account on GitHub.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    It is incredible how Ubuntu can make Debian worst...

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by M@yeulC View Post

                      I agree, and that was the reason I didn't read the article. It was clear to me that Clear Linux would be the title, the title would have been waay better making this explicit.
                      Still doesn't make it clickbait though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X