Tweet
Originally posted by gururise
View Post
-
I have the TinkerBoard and it gets pretty doggone hot after benchmarking. Handle with care or put in a vented case. -
Are these tests all with 32 bit arm32 kernels? Or are some with arm64 kernels?
Some 32 vs 64 bit comparisions would be nice.
RGDS
GARYComment
-
Afaik not much. Especially if we are talking of decent upstream support.Originally posted by coder111 View Post
Dragonboards are the only thing interesting on ARM, apart from that, most stuff is sold at large quantities so only OEMs making phones can afford to buy them. So you are stuck on Allwinner crap and Rockchip, maybe some Amlogic.
Kinda.Another thing I'd like to see is SATA & ECC support. But that would probably go out of cheap enthusiast and into professional high-cost territory.
Afaik the only affordable device with that is Helios4 NAS (based on Marvell ARMADA SoM, which is why it is relatively cheap for what it offers) https://shop.kobol.io/
This is the second batch they manage to fund with preorders. I did preorder one in this second batch so I'll probably get one eventually (they say by october 2018 but whatever)
I assume that they will make another batch eventually after they are done shipping this one, so subscribe to their mailing list or something to be notified when there is another batch.
EDIT: There is also GnuBee (1 and 2), which don't have ECC RAM but have 6 SATA ports (uses 3x ASM1061 Sata controllers on each of the 3 PCIe lanes of the Mediatek SoC) and two gigabit ethernet ports.Last edited by starshipeleven; 17 September 2018, 04:10 PM.Comment
-
AFAIK many of the boards are pretty cheap too. Maybe he just hasn't had time to upgrade the collection. Nano/Orange/Banana Pis are pretty popular, also the RK based boards.Originally posted by coder111 View PostComment
-
Pretty much when it comes to the random ARM boards aside from like Jetson or ASUS, it's just whatever LoveRPI.com ends up sending over... Sadly the likes of ODROID and stuff haven't offered sending over any hardware, so my ARM boards are basically what I get sent out and not much control over that.Originally posted by caligula View PostMichael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/Comment
-
I'm just running some of the benchmarks on a badly cooled RockPro64 with the worlds slowest sd card, some results:
Code:AOBench: pts/aobench-1.0.1 [Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time] Test 4 of 17 Estimated Trial Run Count: 3 Estimated Test Run-Time: 7 Minutes Estimated Time To Completion: 2 Hours, 58 Minutes [00:42 UTC Sep 18] Started Run 1 @ 21:44:53 Started Run 2 @ 21:49:05 Started Run 3 @ 21:52:52 Started Run 4 @ 21:55:50 * Started Run 5 @ 21:59:57 * Started Run 6 @ 22:04:23 * Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time: 250.96009898186 225.29756593704 177.30826401711 245.91919589043 265.31095099449 245.61915016174 Average: 235.07 Seconds Deviation: 13.22% Seconds < Lower Is Better ALL-H3-CC H3 ............ 700 |================================================================================= ALL-H3-CC H2+ ........... 698 |================================================================================= Raspberry Pi 2 B ........ 667 |============================================================================= ALL-H3-CC H5 ............ 491 |========================================================= Banana Pi M3 ............ 461 |===================================================== ODROID-C1+ .............. 457 |===================================================== Socionext Developerbox .. 400 |============================================== Pine64 1GB .............. 352 |========================================= Raspberry Pi 3 B ........ 333 |======================================= Raspberry Pi 3 B+ ....... 290 |================================== Firefly ROC-RK3328-CC ... 289 |================================= AML-S905X-CC Le Potato .. 282 |================================= ODROID-C2 ............... 260 |============================== RockPro64 ............... 235.07 |=========================== Tinker Board ............ 192 |====================== Jetson TX1 .............. 165 |=================== Jetson TX2 .............. 134 |================Code:C-Ray 1.1: pts/c-ray-1.2.0 [Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel] Test 3 of 17 Estimated Trial Run Count: 3 Estimated Test Run-Time: 1 Hour, 3 Minutes Estimated Time To Completion: 4 Hours, 1 Minute [00:42 UTC Sep 18] Started Run 1 @ 20:42:04n Started Run 2 @ 21:03:26 Started Run 3 @ 21:24:24 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel: 1279.137 1255.768 1215.542 Average: 1250.15 Seconds Deviation: 2.57% Seconds < Lower Is Better Raspberry Pi 2 B ........ 4375 |================================================================================ ALL-H3-CC H2+ ........... 4166 |============================================================================ ALL-H3-CC H3 ............ 4156 |============================================================================ ALL-H3-CC H5 ............ 3088 |======================================================== ODROID-C1+ .............. 2720 |================================================== Raspberry Pi 3 B ........ 2357 |=========================================== Pine64 1GB .............. 2342 |=========================================== Raspberry Pi 3 B+ ....... 2074 |====================================== Firefly ROC-RK3328-CC ... 1773 |================================ AML-S905X-CC Le Potato .. 1755 |================================ Banana Pi M3 ............ 1669 |=============================== ODROID-C2 ............... 1537 |============================ RockPro64 ............... 1250.15 |======================= Tinker Board ............ 1048 |=================== Jetson TX1 .............. 851 |================ Jetson TX2 .............. 675 |============ Socionext Developerbox .. 391 |=======Comment
-
Some more:
Code:Tinymembench 2018-05-28: [355/766] pts/tinymembench-1.0.1 [Standard Memcpy] Test 1 of 17 Estimated Trial Run Count: 1 Estimated Test Run-Time: 17 Minutes Estimated Time To Completion: 4 Hours, 20 Minutes [00:32 UTC Sep 18] Started Run 1 @ 20:13:08 Standard Memcpy: 1836.8 Average: 1836.80 MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better Banana Pi M3 ............ 738 |=============== ALL-H3-CC H2+ ........... 827 |================= ALL-H3-CC H3 ............ 912 |=================== ODROID-C1+ .............. 928 |=================== Raspberry Pi 2 B ........ 956 |==================== Raspberry Pi 3 B+ ....... 1288 |=========================== Raspberry Pi 3 B ........ 1297 |=========================== ALL-H3-CC H5 ............ 1339 |============================ Pine64 1GB .............. 1377 |============================= Tinker Board ............ 1502 |=============================== Socionext Developerbox .. 1543 |================================ Firefly ROC-RK3328-CC ... 1566 |================================ ODROID-C2 ............... 1688 |=================================== RockPro64 ............... 1836.80 |====================================== AML-S905X-CC Le Potato .. 2095 |=========================================== Jetson TX2 .............. 3798 |=============================================================================== Jetson TX1 .............. 3862 |===============================================================================$ Standard Memset: 8265.8 Average: 8265.80 MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better Banana Pi M3 ............ 1064 |====== Raspberry Pi 2 B ........ 1177 |======= Raspberry Pi 3 B ........ 1738 |========== Raspberry Pi 3 B+ ....... 1871 |=========== ALL-H3-CC H5 ............ 2193 |============= ALL-H3-CC H2+ ........... 2277 |============= ALL-H3-CC H3 ............ 2278 |============= ODROID-C1+ .............. 2881 |================= Pine64 1GB .............. 3093 |================== ODROID-C2 ............... 3604 |===================== Tinker Board ............ 4192 |======================== AML-S905X-CC Le Potato .. 5535 |================================ Firefly ROC-RK3328-CC ... 7336 |========================================== Socionext Developerbox .. 7359 |========================================== RockPro64 ............... 8265.80 |================================================ Jetson TX1 .............. 10374 |============================================================ Jetson TX2 .............. 13913 |================================================================================Comment
-
-
Wow! Dual A72's and a PCIe >= x4 slot! Only $80 for the 4 GB version.Originally posted by Degra View Post
Just wish it had SATA onboard, but I guess you can use the PCIe slot for that.Comment
-
Set up a gofundme page for a RockPro64 setup, and I'll contribute half.Originally posted by Michael View Post
Add to this Samsung 970 EVO M.2 2280 250GB, currently on Newegg for $88 (see link), and you have a high-end setup for < $250. This SSD should easily saturate PCIe x4, assuming it's PCIe 1.0 (Pine64 doesn't specify, so I assume it is). I first looked at Intel's 128 GB 760p, but that won't do it. Their 256 GB is okay, but costs more than this Samsung.Code:[FONT=courier new]ROCKPro64-SBC ROCKPro64 4GB Single Board Computer $ 79.99 ROCKPro-DesktopNAS-case ROCKPro64 Metal Desktop/NAS Casing $ 44.99 ROCKPro Heatsink-1 ROCKPro64 30mm Tall Profile Heatsink $ 3.49 Fan-for-ROCKPro64-NAS-fan-1 Fan for ROCKPro64 Metal Desktop/NAS casing $ 3.99 12V5A-US-Power-Supply-1 ROCKPro64 12V 5A US POWER SUPPLY $ 12.99 PCIE to M2-2 ROCKPro64 PCI-e X4 to M.2/NGFF NVMe SSD Interface Card $ 5.99 Shipping $ 7.99 ----- Total $159.43[/FONT]
Comment
Comment