Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Performance Cost Of Spectre / Meltdown / Foreshadow Mitigations On Linux 4.19

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by captainohair View Post
    In addition to the relative values posted here, are the absolute values from each test also available?
    Yep, http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...WN82&obr_imw=y As always things are transparent with Phoronix Test Suite and OpenBenchmarking.org.

    Leave a comment:


  • captainohair
    replied
    In addition to the relative values posted here, are the absolute values from each test also available?

    Leave a comment:


  • geearf
    replied
    Originally posted by ipsirc View Post
    You should do a new test with the old intel-microcode 20171117.1, which was the last release without any spectre patches. The up-to-date microcode also lows the performance.
    Yes that would be nice to also include in the tests with or without microcode fixes.

    Leave a comment:


  • davidbepo
    replied
    thanks for the benchmarking michael

    Leave a comment:


  • ipsirc
    replied
    You should do a new test with the old intel-microcode 20171117.1, which was the last release without any spectre patches. The up-to-date microcode also lows the performance.

    Leave a comment:


  • torsionbar28
    replied
    Originally posted by fhuberts View Post
    Thanks for doing these comparisons!
    To me it confirms that AMD is the wiser choice :-)
    For sure, especially in the datacenter. Low single-digit percent impact on AMD, with up to 20% impact on intel. Ouch. EPYC is shaping up to be a real winner for AMD.

    Leave a comment:


  • fhuberts
    replied
    Thanks for doing these comparisons!
    To me it confirms that AMD is the wiser choice :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
    Typo:



    Also, why are the results pictures rather than SVG graphs?

    (DejaVu Sans is the worst font)
    Fixed, thanks.

    Working on some graph code/infrastructure improvements and while those WIP changes were being made, easier just doing this article as pictures.

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    7~16% lower than an umitigated kernel
    Also, why are the results pictures rather than SVG graphs?

    (DejaVu Sans is the worst font)

    Leave a comment:


  • The Performance Cost Of Spectre / Meltdown / Foreshadow Mitigations On Linux 4.19

    Phoronix: The Performance Cost Of Spectre / Meltdown / Foreshadow Mitigations On Linux 4.19

    One of the most frequent test requests recently has been to look at the overall performance cost of Meltdown/Spectre mitigations on the latest Linux kernel and now with L1TF/Foreshadow work tossed into the mix. With the Linux 4.19 kernel that just kicked off development this month has been continued churn in the Spectre/Meltdown space, just not for x86_64 but also for POWER/s390/ARM where applicable. For getting an overall look at the performance impact of these mitigation techniques I tested three Intel Xeon systems and two AMD EPYC systems as well as a virtual machine on each side for seeing how the default Linux 4.19 kernel performance -- with relevant mitigations applied -- to that of an unmitigated kernel.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X