Originally posted by theriddick
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jim Keller Reportedly Joins Intel After AMD, Tesla Stint
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by microcode View PostThere are these things called creativity and experience, engineers and technical managers are often hired for these properties. Shocking!
Outside of the text you cropped out, I also stated how Intel doesn't seem to change their products at all based on what these people could bring to the table. I sure as hell don't see any creativity coming from Intel in years. If what you said was true, it seems Intel is taking the ideas of these creative and experienced people with a grain of salt. Again, I'm referring to everyone Intel has hired who used to work for AMD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostIt seems you have completely missed my points...
Outside of the text you cropped out, I also stated how Intel doesn't seem to change their products at all based on what these people could bring to the table. I sure as hell don't see any creativity coming from Intel in years. If what you said was true, it seems Intel is taking the ideas of these creative and experienced people with a grain of salt. Again, I'm referring to everyone Intel has hired who used to work for AMD.
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostIf what you said was true, it seems Intel is taking the ideas of these creative and experienced people with a grain of salt.
It would be cheaper for them to simply license the patents, than to hire the whole engineer. In reality, they'd have to license the patents anyway if they wanted to use them!Last edited by microcode; 27 April 2018, 05:16 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostIt seems a bit suspicious to me how so many of AMD's employees (not just Koduri or Keller) end up at Intel, despite the fact that Intel's products never seem to change due to their presence. Gets me to think that Intel doesn't really want them as engineers, they just want these people contractually obligated to stop supporting AMD. Intel knows they can't really do anything directly to AMD without igniting a lawsuit, but there's nothing illegal about offering better pay to AMD's employees. As long as AMD doesn't have good engineers, they can't threaten Intel. Intel is overdue for a new architecture, but it wouldn't surprise me if they know that silicon transistors are pretty much at their limit. Intel might not have a worthy replacement, so they just need to slow down AMD's progress until they can figure out what to do.
It's more likely that Intel is just scrambling to actually produce something that people sitting on their 5+ years old Intel PCs will feel interested to upgrade to, and just failing to get decent results.
Comment
-
Originally posted by microcode View PostWell, I left the whole sentence intact. Do you mean to say that you didn't mean what you said?
I meant to say that the idea is probably not to take patented ideas they developed at AMD, but to employ the engineers so that future ideas they have can be used by Intel. This is the purpose of hiring engineers.
So yes, it is reasonable to expect that Intel hired these engineers for future ideas, but don't you find it a little oddly coincidental that they keep hiring people who worked at AMD? This is kinda the point of my post. Sure, these people have a lot of experience, and AMD has good designs. But AMD's designs aren't revolutionary compared to Intel's offerings, despite being very different. Intel doesn't need to side-step their performance, they need a breakthrough.
In reality, they'd have to license the patents anyway if they wanted to use them!
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
This would make so much more sense if Intel didn't dominate the market with like 99% of laptops and 90% of desktops.
It's more likely that Intel is just scrambling to actually produce something that people sitting on their 5+ years old Intel PCs will feel interested to upgrade to, and just failing to get decent results.
Apparently Intel's 10nm process is delayed to some point in 2019 (after it was initially expected by 2017, and then delayed to 2018).
While others are still going to newer process, like 7nm or whatever.Last edited by starshipeleven; 28 April 2018, 04:38 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostAaand my superior abilities to see the future are confirmed yet again (surprise surprise). https://www.extremetech.com/computin...ller-to-fix-it
Apparently Intel's 10nm process is delayed to some point in 2019 (after it was initially expected by 2017, and then delayed to 2018).
While others are still going to newer process, like 7nm or whatever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostDoesn't that problem require a different set of expertise than what people like Keller has to offer? I'm not implying that is the case, I'm actually wondering.
But if they want to keep competing (mostly against their own older products at this point) and they can't just count on shrinking the process node to work as fast/reliably as it worked until now....
they can only try to improve the architecture. And since they can't afford to be dicking around in this situation they hired Keller for the job.
This was going to happen sooner or later as the limits of silicon are reached. Shrinking process node has started to go into "diminishing returns" land years ago already.Last edited by starshipeleven; 28 April 2018, 05:23 PM.
Comment
Comment