Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hoohoo
    replied
    Definitely not chopped liver qua performance.

    Nice.

    How about the price?

    Leave a comment:


  • tildearrow
    replied
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    For those interested there are also some additional benchmarks I ran plus others from the community via Caviun ThunderX on OpenBenchmarking.org.

    Leave a comment:


  • davidbepo
    replied
    pathetic, my 2400g has better performance for a lot of things

    Leave a comment:


  • MoonMoon
    replied
    Can someone please explain to me why compiling a kernel is so slow on that machine? Shouldn't a 96-core machine run circles around a Ryzen 3 when compiling a kernel?

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System

    Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System

    Phoronix: Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System

    A Phoronix reader granted us remote access to a FOXCONN C2U4N_MB system featuring two Cavium ThunderX 48-core SoCs. For those curious about the potential of a modern 96-core ARM platform, here are some basic benchmark results.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X