Definitely not chopped liver qua performance.
Nice.
How about the price?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System
Collapse
X
-
Typo:
Originally posted by phoronix View PostFor those interested there are also some additional benchmarks I ran plus others from the community via Caviun ThunderX on OpenBenchmarking.org.
Leave a comment:
-
pathetic, my 2400g has better performance for a lot of things
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Can someone please explain to me why compiling a kernel is so slow on that machine? Shouldn't a 96-core machine run circles around a Ryzen 3 when compiling a kernel?
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System
Phoronix: Benchmarking An ARM 96-Core Cavium ThunderX System
A Phoronix reader granted us remote access to a FOXCONN C2U4N_MB system featuring two Cavium ThunderX 48-core SoCs. For those curious about the potential of a modern 96-core ARM platform, here are some basic benchmark results.
Tags: None
Leave a comment: