MSI Z170A GAMING PRO: A Nice Board For Building A Skylake Linux System

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67078

    MSI Z170A GAMING PRO: A Nice Board For Building A Skylake Linux System

    Phoronix: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO: A Nice Board For Building A Skylake Linux System

    Since I started delivering my Skylake Linux tests back in August, I've received many inquiries from Phoronix readers curious about what motherboard I've been using, etc. Long story short, all of my initial Intel Skylake Linux testing has been done with the MSI Z170A GAMING PRO motherboard, which has been working out well.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • Jabberwocky
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 1186

    #2
    Any idea why the SATA ports are not on the side of the board?

    With this size "GAMING PRO" motherboard it will usually go into a big case with big graphics cards. It looks like, at the very least, the bottom x2 ports will block a second graphics card.

    Comment

    • SBeaver
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2015
      • 5

      #3
      I have the Gigabyte Z170M, it's a bit cheaper but all boards are pretty similar nowadays. Everything in Skylake is great except the built-in graphics. It's OK for desktop use but nothing more. 4.3 kernel does not bring performance increases over 4.2 that I've noticed, only the experimental flag is turned off which is nice but really says a lot about Intel and their supposed "great" Linux support. It's now 1.5 months since release and there is still no stable linux kernel that works with skylake out of the box. By the time 4.3 is released, it will be more like 2-3 months.

      Comment

      • DanL
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2007
        • 3116

        #4
        Originally posted by Jabberwocky View Post
        Any idea why the SATA ports are not on the side of the board? It looks like, at the very least, the bottom x2 ports will block a second graphics card.
        How many people (especially Linux users) really run multiple graphics cards? I've got an Antec Sonata Solo MiniTower, and I wish the SATA ports on my mobo would not have been on the side.

        Comment

        • M1kkko
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 377

          #5
          Originally posted by DanL View Post

          How many people (especially Linux users) really run multiple graphics cards? I've got an Antec Sonata Solo MiniTower, and I wish the SATA ports on my mobo would not have been on the side.

          It's hard to say how many, but I do. It's awesome for a multi-seat gaming computer, having one gpu per seat. I might build another one in the future.

          Comment

          • staggerlee
            Phoronix Member
            • Mar 2015
            • 62

            #6
            I use 2 r9 280x in crossfire for gaming in manjaro and it works great as long as you want to use catalyst. You also could get pci passthrough with kvm if that would be something you want to do.

            Comment

            • kaprikawn
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2013
              • 834

              #7
              Would love to see some benchmarks using the M2 slot, or any consumer-level (cheapish) SSD using something not constrained by the SATA3 port.

              Interesting that they're using dual channel memory, previous motherboards could handle triple channel using an i7. Did they just conclude it wasn't worth it?

              Comment

              • patrik
                Junior Member
                • Jul 2009
                • 47

                #8
                Michael, how deep into package C state do you get this rig? I've had some trouble with my MSI Gaming 3 + Haswell-E. My conclusion was bad ASPM config from the UEFI.

                Comment

                • Techwolf
                  Junior Member
                  • Sep 2015
                  • 22

                  #9
                  "Supports ECC, un-buffered memory" Wait a minute, didn't Intel intentionally disable/remove all ECC support from all there desktop CPUs?

                  Comment

                  • merito
                    Junior Member
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 1

                    #10
                    Do you know how RAID on Z170 chipset works with modern Linux? Are there any problems? I have no experience in RAIDs and I want to use it with motherboard with this chipset.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X