Asrock Q1900B-ITX

[enihcam]

dmesg

And my review is ready: the build and the benchmarks of J1900.

Great benchmarks!

Also, could you please post the dmesg info? It's because I'd like to know whether ASPM is (can be) turned on for saving more power.

[riklaunim]

And my review is ready: the build and the benchmarks of J1900.

[riklaunim]

The set is done:
- multimedia: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404268PL01
- gpu: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404277PL96
- games: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404273PL72
- cpu: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404275PL44
- crypto: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404272PL08
- general speed: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404272PL09

[dungeon]

OK so those test are with burst on . Who knows maybe phoronix-test-suite adds +500MHz when burst frequency is there .

[riklaunim]

Those are pretty good result you have .

Ah, you overclocked that from 2 GHz to 2.9 that explain things . Beware of temp it is fanless

Hm... tests made on 3.15rc2 Kernel show 2.9 GHz for some reason. I didn't change anything in the BIOS and /proc/cpuinfo says 1.99 GHz. Also temperatures are low (I'm pushing GPU tests right now). Acording to specs it can't have 2.9 GHz. lscpu says it runs at max frequency from the sheet:

CPU MHz:               2424.000

[dungeon]

Those are pretty good result you have .

Ah, you overclocked that from 2 GHz to 2.9 that explain things . Beware of temp it is fanless

[riklaunim]

Multimedia: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404268PL01

Kernel 3.15 and Oibaf Mesa: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404250PL78 - doesn't help really


In the fanless design at high load it got up to 67C at horizontal orientation:

acpitz-virtual-0
Adapter: Virtual device
temp1:        +26.8?C  (crit = +90.0?C)

coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 0:       +65.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
Core 1:       +65.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
Core 2:       +67.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
Core 3:       +67.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)

nct6776-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
Vcore:          +0.81 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +1.74 V)
in1:            +1.86 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
AVCC:           +3.34 V  (min =  +2.98 V, max =  +3.63 V)
+3.3V:          +3.33 V  (min =  +2.98 V, max =  +3.63 V)
in4:            +0.94 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
in5:            +1.73 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
in6:            +0.82 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
3VSB:           +3.46 V  (min =  +2.98 V, max =  +3.63 V)
Vbat:           +3.34 V  (min =  +2.70 V, max =  +3.63 V)
fan1:             0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan2:             0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
SYSTIN:         +48.0?C  (high =  +0.0?C, hyst =  +0.0?C)  ALARM  sensor = thermistor
CPUTIN:         +57.5?C  (high = +80.0?C, hyst = +75.0?C)  sensor = thermistor
AUXTIN:         +41.0?C  (high = +80.0?C, hyst = +75.0?C)  sensor = thermistor
PCH_CHIP_TEMP:   +0.0?C  
PCH_CPU_TEMP:    +0.0?C  
PCH_MCH_TEMP:    +0.0?C  
intrusion0:    ALARM
intrusion1:    ALARM
beep_enable:   disabled

[dungeon]

http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404206SO61

It runs like it has H264/VP8+ and AES-NI . in games "great" too... pretty unbelievable results to me .

[maligor]

The title is correct as it's a comparison. J1900 is the third system in that test.

Two more:

http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1404250-PL-1404175SO11

http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404206SO61

Pretty interesting results, the only reason I got a Athlon 5350 + AM1B-ITX instead of Baytrails is because Intel seems to slow on the gallium side. (And I'm a fool for fancy shiny pebbles)

I don't think I've seen anyone mention if the J1900 supports H264/VP8+ hardware decode however? Intel's specs certainly seem ambiguous on the specifics, including the graphics core itself.

[riklaunim]

Do you have the link to the J1900 openbenchmarking? (link in post above is "AMD FUSION E-350 APU UBUNTU 12.10 LINUX")

The title is correct as it's a comparison. J1900 is the third system in that test.

Two more:

http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1404250-PL-1404175SO11

http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1404250-PL-1404206SO61