Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Asrock Q1900B-ITX

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • riklaunim
    replied
    Like this one: http://openbenchmarking.org/system/1...0Xubuntu/dmesg ?

    Leave a comment:


  • enihcam
    replied
    dmesg

    Originally posted by riklaunim View Post
    And my review is ready: the build and the benchmarks of J1900.

    Great benchmarks!

    Also, could you please post the dmesg info? It's because I'd like to know whether ASPM is (can be) turned on for saving more power.

    Leave a comment:


  • riklaunim
    replied
    And my review is ready: the build and the benchmarks of J1900.

    Leave a comment:


  • riklaunim
    replied
    The set is done:
    - multimedia: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404268PL01
    - gpu: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404277PL96
    - games: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404273PL72
    - cpu: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404275PL44
    - crypto: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404272PL08
    - general speed: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404272PL09

    Leave a comment:


  • dungeon
    replied
    OK so those test are with burst on . Who knows maybe phoronix-test-suite adds +500MHz when burst frequency is there .

    Leave a comment:


  • riklaunim
    replied
    Originally posted by dungeon View Post
    Those are pretty good result you have .

    Ah, you overclocked that from 2 GHz to 2.9 that explain things . Beware of temp it is fanless
    Hm... tests made on 3.15rc2 Kernel show 2.9 GHz for some reason. I didn't change anything in the BIOS and /proc/cpuinfo says 1.99 GHz. Also temperatures are low (I'm pushing GPU tests right now). Acording to specs it can't have 2.9 GHz. lscpu says it runs at max frequency from the sheet:
    Code:
    CPU MHz:               2424.000
    Last edited by riklaunim; 04-26-2014, 09:20 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dungeon
    replied
    Those are pretty good result you have .

    Ah, you overclocked that from 2 GHz to 2.9 that explain things . Beware of temp it is fanless
    Last edited by dungeon; 04-26-2014, 09:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • riklaunim
    replied
    Multimedia: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404268PL01

    Kernel 3.15 and Oibaf Mesa: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404250PL78 - doesn't help really


    In the fanless design at high load it got up to 67C at horizontal orientation:
    Code:
    acpitz-virtual-0
    Adapter: Virtual device
    temp1:        +26.8?C  (crit = +90.0?C)
    
    coretemp-isa-0000
    Adapter: ISA adapter
    Core 0:       +65.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
    Core 1:       +65.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
    Core 2:       +67.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
    Core 3:       +67.0?C  (high = +105.0?C, crit = +105.0?C)
    
    nct6776-isa-0290
    Adapter: ISA adapter
    Vcore:          +0.81 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +1.74 V)
    in1:            +1.86 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
    AVCC:           +3.34 V  (min =  +2.98 V, max =  +3.63 V)
    +3.3V:          +3.33 V  (min =  +2.98 V, max =  +3.63 V)
    in4:            +0.94 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
    in5:            +1.73 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
    in6:            +0.82 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +0.00 V)  ALARM
    3VSB:           +3.46 V  (min =  +2.98 V, max =  +3.63 V)
    Vbat:           +3.34 V  (min =  +2.70 V, max =  +3.63 V)
    fan1:             0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
    fan2:             0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
    SYSTIN:         +48.0?C  (high =  +0.0?C, hyst =  +0.0?C)  ALARM  sensor = thermistor
    CPUTIN:         +57.5?C  (high = +80.0?C, hyst = +75.0?C)  sensor = thermistor
    AUXTIN:         +41.0?C  (high = +80.0?C, hyst = +75.0?C)  sensor = thermistor
    PCH_CHIP_TEMP:   +0.0?C  
    PCH_CPU_TEMP:    +0.0?C  
    PCH_MCH_TEMP:    +0.0?C  
    intrusion0:    ALARM
    intrusion1:    ALARM
    beep_enable:   disabled

    Leave a comment:


  • dungeon
    replied
    It runs like it has H264/VP8+ and AES-NI . in games "great" too... pretty unbelievable results to me .

    Leave a comment:


  • maligor
    replied
    Originally posted by riklaunim View Post
    The title is correct as it's a comparison. J1900 is the third system in that test.

    Two more:
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404175SO11
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...PL-1404206SO61
    Pretty interesting results, the only reason I got a Athlon 5350 + AM1B-ITX instead of Baytrails is because Intel seems to slow on the gallium side. (And I'm a fool for fancy shiny pebbles)

    I don't think I've seen anyone mention if the J1900 supports H264/VP8+ hardware decode however? Intel's specs certainly seem ambiguous on the specifics, including the graphics core itself.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X