Coreboot Issues Rebuttal To Recent Laptop Vendor Controversy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • back2未來
    replied
    [ Why is it that difficult porting coreboot to another board (laptop, desktop, workstation mainboard) with staying on same ISA like x86, riscV (firmware being 16bit executables for 32&64bit mode bios and uefi fw drivers and binaries) for just having a basic bootcode, initializing voltage levels, power sources for the cpu, initilize memory and a serial(/usb) terminal for then loading a capable 2nd stage bootloader, e.g. grub2, (lilo,) syslinux, u-boot or bootmgfw.efi? (thx) ]

    Leave a comment:


  • r_a_trip
    replied
    Originally posted by lowflyer View Post
    "they" is a perfect pronoun for a single person in today's distorted minds around world.
    When did they become singular?

    1375

    The singular they isn't actually new. According to The Oxford English Dictionary, the singular they showed up in writing in 1375—over 600 years ago! The OED also suggests the usage is even older since written language usually reflects trends already present in spoken language.

    Leave a comment:


  • toves
    replied
    Originally posted by AHSauge View Post

    They do, but in this case, "they" have been used for both singular and plural for many, many decades, so it's not a change at all. Then again, I hope anyone complaining about singular "they" for consistency uses "thou" for singular second person. I mean, if they don't want languages to change, then at least be consistent about it
    All true. Enough confusion arises when you is used in contexts where the distinction between singular and plural is important or requires a periphrastic decoration (as in you all) without encouraging the replication of the same ambiguity by revitalising a historical usage of the third person just to conceal natural gender. English already has ungendered one and it.

    Old English still (just) had the dual wit (we two), unser (us two) which was only used by Beowulf when talking to a dragon so we might revive that usage too.

    The primary function of language is communication and any syntactic change which reduces the accuracy and efficacy of that communication by introducing unintended ambiguity is not actually progress. As always usage and time are the ultimate arbitrator in these matters.
    ​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • toves
    replied
    Originally posted by dEnigma View Post
    I would try to get Austria banned, but they already did ban it (and Luxembourg) when they banned Germany, for some reason.
    Didn't Luxembourg invade Poland at some point? No that can't be right.
    I wouldn't think Malibalman's forté was history but I suspect the company itself is.

    Leave a comment:


  • AHSauge
    replied
    Originally posted by BesiegedAce View Post

    Language evolves and changes.
    They do, but in this case, "they" have been used for both singular and plural for many, many decades, so it's not a change at all. Then again, I hope anyone complaining about singular "they" for consistency uses "thou" for singular second person. I mean, if they don't want languages to change, then at least be consistent about it

    Leave a comment:


  • toves
    replied
    Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post
    80% is a stupid number to use. If a car is 80% complete that means it could possibly be missing a crucial part.

    ❌ Engine
    ✅ Suspension
    ✅ Bodywork
    ✅ Transmission
    ✅ Infotainment
    ❌ Doors
    ✅ Windows
    ✅ Windshield
    ✅ Trunk
    ✅ Radiator
    The new Tesla's optional extras?

    Leave a comment:


  • toves
    replied
    Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post

    J'emmerde MALIBAL, des Cajuns aux Canucks et à tous ceux qui vivent là où tombe l'ombre de l'oie.
    Where the goose's shadow falls? Don't quite grok that. A Canadian or Québécois thing?
    I hadn't encountered emmerder - sheltered life I guess - Oddly I guessed it was a compound of ex + merde (ie to defæcate) but apparently not quite but the sense is not far from that.

    Leave a comment:


  • BesiegedAce
    replied
    Originally posted by lowflyer View Post

    "they" is a perfect pronoun for a single person in today's distorted minds around world.
    Language evolves and changes.

    Leave a comment:


  • lowflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by QwertyChouskie View Post

    "they"

    (It's one person)
    "they" is a perfect pronoun for a single person in today's distorted minds around world.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexmitter
    replied
    Originally posted by botipua22 View Post
    ngl i am a malibal fan after reading their blog post. the way they ban place X or vendor Y "for life" is unhinged but hilarious and kind of based.
    Behaving like a stupid entitled bratty child is not "based", not now, not ever.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X