Originally posted by aviallon
View Post
PCI Express 7.0 v0.3 Specification Shared With PCI-SIG Members
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by caligula View Post
Well, the boot process isn't too fast these days. A faster disk would help a lot. This is with 5000 series Ryzen & PCIe 4.0 SSD:
Code:$ systemd-analyze Startup finished in 17.382s (firmware) + 528ms (loader) + 3.810s (kernel) + 10.344s (userspace) = 32.066s graphical.target reached after 7.505s in userspace. $ systemd-analyze blame 27.478s fstrim.service 5.894s systemd-swap.service ...
Perhaps enable Fast boot in your "BIOS" settings?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Oooh, looks like fun!
Startup finished in 8.415s (firmware) + 5.681s (loader) + 2.351s (kernel) + 15.132s (userspace) = 31.581s
graphical.target reached after 4.109s in userspace.
ManjaroKDE, current as of 16/06/23 (6.4rc2 kernel), 8 GB RAM, AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by caligula View Post
Well, the boot process isn't too fast these days. A faster disk would help a lot. This is with 5000 series Ryzen & PCIe 4.0 SSD:
Code:$ systemd-analyze Startup finished in 17.382s (firmware) + 528ms (loader) + 3.810s (kernel) + 10.344s (userspace) = 32.066s graphical.target reached after 7.505s in userspace. $ systemd-analyze blame 27.478s fstrim.service 5.894s systemd-swap.service ...
On Lubuntu 22.04 LTS with an Intel i3-7100U (fully mitigated) + cheapest 256 GB PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD from 2019:
Startup finished in 7.522s (firmware) + 4.515s (loader) + 5.474s (kernel) + 9.074s (userspace) = 26.586s
graphical.target reached after 9.062s in userspace
6.701s NetworkManager-wait-online.service
1.988s snapd.service
1.828s vboxdrv.service
908ms dev-nvme0n1p2.device
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by rob-tech View PostLovely, however, there is still no need for PCIe 5.0 let alone 7.0
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by torsionbar28 View PostThis is not for the consumer. This is to support emerging server I/O standards that require more bandwidth than is currently available. 400 GBE, 800 GBE, etc. I'd be surprised if you see PCIe 7.0 at the consumer level in a decade from now even.
Code:$ systemd-analyze Startup finished in 17.382s (firmware) + 528ms (loader) + 3.810s (kernel) + 10.344s (userspace) = 32.066s graphical.target reached after 7.505s in userspace. $ systemd-analyze blame 27.478s fstrim.service 5.894s systemd-swap.service ...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Exactly my thoughts. This is for those cases where there 1,934,302 CPU, GFX and AI cores feeding 4^34 TB RAM in a cube metre of datacentre space.
I'm still happily plonking along on PCIe 2 levels, despite 3/4 support.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by rob-tech View PostLovely, however, there is still no need for PCIe 5.0 let alone 7.0 as even the best GPUs run on version 4.0 and anything more just doesn't seem to benefit the consumer at this point and isn't likely to for many years.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Lovely, however, there is still no need for PCIe 5.0 let alone 7.0 as even the best GPUs run on version 4.0 and anything more just doesn't seem to benefit the consumer at this point and isn't likely to for many years.
Leave a comment:
-
-
PCI Express 7.0 v0.3 Specification Shared With PCI-SIG Members
Phoronix: PCI Express 7.0 v0.3 Specification Shared With PCI-SIG Members
Ahead of the planned full specification release in 2025, the PCI-SIG has now shared with its members the first review draft "v0.3" of PCI Express 7.0...
Tags: None
-
Leave a comment: