Originally posted by Adarion
View Post
Originally posted by Adarion
View Post
Originally posted by Adarion
View Post
The AMD support for AGESA was certainly nicer than what we have today by CPU vendors in that they scrubbed internal code for a fully open source release, but there are probably more engineers from CPU vendors involved in coreboot development today than AMD had firmware engineers in total back then. So all in all, a mixed bag. Fully open source firmware definitely remains the goal, but that part of the computing space sadly isn't very conductive to it, and hardware is only getting more complex, so achieving that goal remains an uphill struggle.
(Full Disclosure: I work on coreboot as part of the Chrome OS firmware team, although not when the decision for coreboot was made or even with the first few generations of Chromebooks. I worked on coreboot in other companies before that. I also managed a few coreboot releases, including the just-announced 4.12.)
Leave a comment: