Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 vs. Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev Git

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 vs. Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev Git

    Phoronix: AMDGPU-PRO 17.10 vs. Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev Git

    Given the RadeonSI/Gallium3D threaded pipe context work having landed earlier this week and there being other performance improvements with Linux 4.12 and Mesa 17.2-dev, here are some fresh benchmarks on an AMD Polaris card comparing this latest open-source graphics driver code as of this week compared to AMD's latest hybrid driver, AMDGPU-PRO 17.10.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    mesa is going to be superlative.

    Comment


    • #3
      Someone on the forums wrote that Saints Row benefits from Gallium3D threading recently. I hoped to see that benchmarked here on phoronix.

      Comment


      • #4
        Cool, those drivers are getting better and better for GCN+ cards, very nice.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi Michael, can I find this results on openbenchmarking.org as one profile, or did you do them locally and separately? I would like to make the same run on my machine to compare.
          Thanks!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jf33 View Post
            Someone on the forums wrote that Saints Row benefits from Gallium3D threading recently. I hoped to see that benchmarked here on phoronix.
            AFAIK, Saints Row doesn't have any integrated benchmarking capability??
            Michael Larabel
            https://www.michaellarabel.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks @Michael the 1080p tests was much more interesting the the previous benchmark.
              It's looking great in many games but Madmax difference was brutal.
              Comparing the results against earlier nvidia testing shows how good the results are.
              Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

              Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
              Last edited by Nille_kungen; 20 May 2017, 02:28 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Nille_kungen View Post
                It's looking great in many games but Madmax difference was brutal.
                Comparing the results against earlier nvidia testing shows how good the results are.
                results are even better, because nvidia had faster cpu

                Comment


                • #9
                  would be really nice to see avg GPU load.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Nille_kungen View Post
                    Thanks @Michael the 1080p tests was much more interesting the the previous benchmark.
                    It's looking great in many games but Madmax difference was brutal.
                    Comparing the results against earlier nvidia testing shows how good the results are.
                    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...dia-vlk-madmax
                    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...-nvidia-madmax
                    actually comparing the results they seem too good to be true.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X