NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs. 760 vs. 960 vs. 1060 Linux Performance

[phoronix]

Phoronix: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs. 760 vs. 960 vs. 1060 Linux Performance

To complement yesterday's launch-day GeForce GTX 1060 Linux review, here are some more benchmark results with the various NVIDIA x60 graphics cards I have available for testing going back to the GeForce GTX 460 Fermi. If you are curious about the raw OpenGL/OpenCL/CUDA performance and performance-per-Watt for these mid-range x60 graphics cards from Fermi, Kepler, Maxwell, and Pascal, here are these benchmarks from Ubuntu 16.04 Linux.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=23367

[pinguinpc]

Thanks for 1080p tests and for add bioshock infinite - dirt showdown

But why dont test 367.35 drivers in this tests ??

[Passso]

Happy to see some articles about mid range cards. Thank you Michael!

[Michael]

Thanks for 1080p tests and for add bioshock infinite - dirt showdown

But why dont test 367.35 drivers in this tests ??

Because I started my launch day 1060 tests back when .27 was the latest driver...

[sdack]

Thanks for 1080p tests and for add bioshock infinite - dirt showdown

But why dont test 367.35 drivers in this tests ??

He probably got too excited thinking about using a new driver ...



and lost it.

[AndyChow]

If only CPU generations would show such improvements. It's almost linear.

[Dukenukemx]

Not bad for a $300 graphics card.

[stqn]

4K again… nobody uses 4K. And these cards are not made for 4K gaming.

[nevion]

Michael - you ever thought of adding arrayfire to the benchmarks you use for OpenCL/Cuda? That library is highly tuned to supporting different processors/arches pretty well, more than most GPU software is. You can see some meaningful common benchmarks of the library here: http://arrayfire.com/arrayfire-bench...aswell-part-1/

[tweak42]

Instead of the GTX 460, I would have loved to see comparison with the AMD RX 480 both 4GB and 8GB models.