I believe around 85 watts under load for rx480.
Place Your Bets Now About The Power Efficiency Of The Radeon RX 480 On Linux
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by danieru View PostMichael performance-per-dollar is missing
BTW you seem like you gained weight this year. But that's no reason to be like that while holding your RX 480. Just look around you, and see all you have build over the years: Phoronix, openbenchmarking, all those compile servers you have back there. Be proud!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eydee View PostConsidering that the "opponent" is not out yet and hasn't even been shown yet, the 480 at this point should beat everything as for price-performance ratio, probably power-performance too. Otherwise AMD could be in trouble.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by danieru View PostBTW you seem like you gained weight this year. But that's no reason to be like that while holding your RX 480.
Originally posted by danieru View PostJust look around you, and see all you have build over the years: Phoronix, openbenchmarking, all those compile servers you have back there. Be proud!
Comment
-
-
The Ashes Async_Compute benchmark we all saw goes like this: 2x RX480 @11Tflops and 90% utilization(150 watts for both), had 10% more performance than a GTX1080 @9Tflops and 100% utilization(180 watts), wile the GTX was cheating with snow. Meaning that the +50% performance per flop comparison that Nvidia had is now lost and AMD does have a +35% performance per watt advantage (probably because of the lithography).
I also propose to stop benchmarking until there is at least one Async_Compute game on Linux, because you give false impressions about AMD GPUs.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by artivision View PostI also propose to stop benchmarking until there is at least one Async_Compute game on Linux, because you give false impressions about AMD GPUs.
Comment
-
Comment