I guess Michael can improve phoronix-test-suite to automaticaly calculate and show percentages in benchmarks. People often talking about and can remember percentages .
I also use radeon driver but i always talking roughly about 80%, sometimes it can be above 100% of fglrx performance, sometimes 70% let say. Depending on the app it can be 40-130% but those are extremes and rarely happens
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Big Graphics Card Comparison Of Metro Redux Games On Linux
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gusar View PostI've seen Windows slideshows too. But the cause was the 5+ app updaters running in the background and various kinds of shovelware that willingly or unwillingly found its way onto the computer. The GPU being Intel, AMD or Nvidia. It seems your repair services are mostly centered around scamming people into buying new hardware.
Those are the only options that exists. If my customers don't choose 1: then I fall back to 2:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Temar View PostNope, you are hallucinating or you fail in percentage calculations.
Some very old cards get close to 90% in some tests but most of the time the open driver loses by a mile.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostI repair windows computers for a living. I have to deal with Intels slideshow desktop basically everyday.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostMost of them OSS is 90% or better.
Some very old cards get close to 90% in some tests but most of the time the open driver loses by a mile.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Temar View PostMaybe in your wet dreams:
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
I wouldn't call it "WAAAAY faster" but at least it can beat Catalyst in some tests:
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...xorg-117&num=1
I hate to say it, but benchmarking 2d doesn't work well. Maybe it isn't very measurable but it is very percievable.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gusar View PostErm, dude, WTF are you talking about? Seriously, what the heck are you talking about? This is so far removed from reality, it's... cloud cuckoo land.
Lay off the drugs man. Drugs are bad, mkay?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostThe truth is the -only- Intel GPU that can run a desktop comfortably is the Iris Pro with integrated eDRAM. Lets look at the past here.... On Vista's launch Intel graphics couldn't run that desktop. On windows 8 launch Intel graphics couldn't run that desktop. On KDE4 release Intel graphics couldn't run that desktop. On Gnome3 release Intel graphics couldn't run that desktop. How many times does Intel have to prove that they don't care?
Lay off the drugs man. Drugs are bad, mkay?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: