Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA Wins Over AMD For Linux Gaming Ultra HD 4K Performance
Collapse
X
-
Slightly OT: Does anyone know if you can downsample on Linux? I'd love to run a 4K Res on my 1440p monitor in games.
-
I wonder how not being able to tell a pixel apart from its neighbor makes a game more fun
Leave a comment:
-
Actually they do...
Originally posted by clementl View Post... In the end people buying a top-end GTX 780 TI don't really care all that much about price/performance ratio's.
How much time and hassle is it to configure and install a quad-crossfire 260x rig? Lost me there already - my time is more valuable than that. GTX780Ti it is.
Life advice: Drive a sensible car so you can afford kick-ass tech.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by atari314Uhn, I could make a quad crossfire of R9 270x (~200$ each) for the price of a single GTX 780 Ti (~800$).
Sure, Nvidia "wins".
And I also think that a 780 TI will consume less electricity.
In the end people buying a top-end GTX 780 TI don't really care all that much about price/performance ratio's.
Leave a comment:
-
The 750Ti is definitely worth the $20 "premium"
Originally posted by Pontostroy View Postr7 260x(~129$) in most tests >= 750ti(~149$). Where is Nvidia wins?
- The 260X with almost double the TDP (60W vs 115W) might take an additional $20 in additional electricity over its life.
- If we have to update your power supply to use it, then the 750Ti is a no-brainer, as we aren't going to do that for less than $20.
- Capabilities provided by the 750Ti (stability, best-in-class OGL4.4, multi-year support, CUDA, openCL perf)
- If the Ti saves us an hour in fiddling with configurations over its life, we definitely come out ahead (assuming we value our time > $20/hr). I have 100% confidence, based on extensive experience, that we would spend definitely less using NV.
Prototype Steamboxes seem to prefer 750Ti's over 260X's for all the reasons listed above.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pontostroy View Postr7 260x(~129$) in most tests >= 750ti(~149$). Where is Nvidia wins?
P.S. Talking about the 2GB version of the 260x, of course. The 1GB version would performance much worse at high resolutions.
Leave a comment:
-
When running Valve's Counter-Strike: Source at 3840 x 2160, the graphics cards that couldn't deliver at least a 60 FPS average were the GTX 650, GT 740, and GTX 750 Ti.
Leave a comment:
-
r7 260x(~129$) in most tests >= 750ti(~149$). Where is Nvidia wins?
Leave a comment:
-
NVIDIA Wins Over AMD For Linux Gaming Ultra HD 4K Performance
Phoronix: NVIDIA Wins Over AMD For Linux Gaming Ultra HD 4K Performance
As it's been a while since last delivering any "4K" resolution OpenGL benchmarks at Phoronix, out today -- now that we're done with our massive 60+ GPU open-source testing and 35-way proprietary driver comparison -- are benchmarks of several NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon graphics cards when running an assortment of Linux games and other OpenGL tests at the 4K resolution.
Tags: None
Leave a comment: