Lucid Hydra Is Still Useless On Linux

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Lucid Hydra Is Still Useless On Linux

For anyone wondering whether the Hydra and other products from LucidLogix yet work under Linux, they do not...

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTIxOQ

[kbios]

Phoronix: Lucid Hydra Is Still Useless On Linux

For anyone wondering whether the Hydra and other products from LucidLogix yet work under Linux, they do not...

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTIxOQ

From the reviews I've read, it's not that useful on windows either, and far too unstable to be used daily.

[devius]

What?? A hardware vendor not supporting linux?? That's outrageous!!!
</sarcasm>

I remember seeing a few reviews when Hydra came out and it had terrible performance. Oh, and it cost a lot too.

[Wyatt]

Speaking of hardware that no one talks about, Intel HyperMemory still isn't supported in Linux either, that I know of.

[devius]

Speaking of hardware that no one talks about, Intel HyperMemory still isn't supported in Linux either, that I know of.

Don't you mean AMD (former ATI) HyperMemory?

[Wyatt]

Don't you mean AMD (former ATI) HyperMemory?

No, I mean Intel TurboMemory. Mixed up my pointless superlative jargon.

[agd5f]

Don't you mean AMD (former ATI) HyperMemory?

ATI/AMD hypermemory is just a marketing term for GART memory and it has been supported in the open source drivers since they were written.