Hello,
I just upgraded my HD4850 to a Nvidia GTX 460. The GTX 460 is of course a faster, newer generation card. It performs much better, games that I couldn't run at full 1920x1080 with high settings (GTA4 for example) run very smoothly now.
The only nuisance that I have about this card is the noise, which is about the same as my old HD4850. I would have preferred a less noisy card, but the noise is not overly disturbing or anything like that. The card I got is the Galaxy GTX 460 GC Version that comes factory overclocked to 700Mhz Core / 3.7 Ghz Mem. Due to the overclock, power consumption and temperature are a little bit higher than the stock/reference design versions.
So far the linux desktop experience has been beautiful. Videos do not tear, desktop effects run smoothly, 2D accel is also smooth. Overall a much more seamless, better performing, and bug-free experience than Catalyst or the xf86-video-ati-git drivers with the HD4850.
On top of that if I would have gone the AMD way and gotten the HD5850 instead I would have had to deal with couple issues: Open source support for this card is not there yet, so I couldn't be able to do use Xv/Mesa. Also, the Catalyst drivers have always been buggy to say the least, so I would have to deal with tearing in movies, disabling desktop effects in a lot of cases, and under-performing 2D acceleration, etc.
My take is that in the future, AMD's Catalyst and Open Source solutions will catch up to Nvidia's proprietary drivers. But for now, Nvidia has the advantage and all the perks, the desktop experience is much more natural.
I just upgraded my HD4850 to a Nvidia GTX 460. The GTX 460 is of course a faster, newer generation card. It performs much better, games that I couldn't run at full 1920x1080 with high settings (GTA4 for example) run very smoothly now.
The only nuisance that I have about this card is the noise, which is about the same as my old HD4850. I would have preferred a less noisy card, but the noise is not overly disturbing or anything like that. The card I got is the Galaxy GTX 460 GC Version that comes factory overclocked to 700Mhz Core / 3.7 Ghz Mem. Due to the overclock, power consumption and temperature are a little bit higher than the stock/reference design versions.
So far the linux desktop experience has been beautiful. Videos do not tear, desktop effects run smoothly, 2D accel is also smooth. Overall a much more seamless, better performing, and bug-free experience than Catalyst or the xf86-video-ati-git drivers with the HD4850.
On top of that if I would have gone the AMD way and gotten the HD5850 instead I would have had to deal with couple issues: Open source support for this card is not there yet, so I couldn't be able to do use Xv/Mesa. Also, the Catalyst drivers have always been buggy to say the least, so I would have to deal with tearing in movies, disabling desktop effects in a lot of cases, and under-performing 2D acceleration, etc.
My take is that in the future, AMD's Catalyst and Open Source solutions will catch up to Nvidia's proprietary drivers. But for now, Nvidia has the advantage and all the perks, the desktop experience is much more natural.
Comment