At least with the current Radeon Software for Linux 21.10 packaged Vulkan driver, the Vulkan ray-tracing performance is painfully low for NVIDIA's Quake II RTX port on Linux.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Quake II RTX Performance For AMD Radeon 6000 Series vs. NVIDIA On Linux
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
Everything is correct. Its Nvidias Quake 2 RTX port ran via the Radeon Software driver package that is painfully slow.
The code itself is open, I don't see any issues reported about flawed AMD-related implementations. And developers aren't all from Nvidia, I've even found one from Microsoft.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by CochainComplex View PostWe need to wait for second the Raytracing Generation of AMD. Nvidia is already on the second, so they have some points in advance. Hopefully AMD can catch up
- Likes 3
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Luke_Wolf View Post
Yep for 6000 series it's well known at this point that AMD is generally faster with Raster Graphics while being roughly in the same state as Nvidia's 2000 series on ray tracing when DLSS isn't enabled, while Nvidia is far ahead on Raytracing... That said right now Ray Tracing doesn't provide much visual benefit and we're going to have to wait a few generations for either vendor to really be good at it.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment