Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DisplayPort 2.0 Published For 3x Increase In Data Bandwidth Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • milkylainen
    replied
    Oh please. Can't we just have one transmission protocol for everything now please?
    I know of the attempts, but it is still very much divergent.
    Each contemporary generation of all these protocols all use the same base SerDes available on the ASIC market for transmission anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • numacross
    replied
    Originally posted by torsionbar28 View Post
    DVI was video-only, it never had the ability to carry audio.
    It's possible to use a DVI-HDMI cable and get audio that way, at least on nVidia cards.

    Leave a comment:


  • numacross
    replied
    Originally posted by SyXbiT View Post
    Are there pros/cons that make one better suited to TV or Monitor, or do we have two similar standards just for historical reasons?
    HDMI has licensing and royalty fees per unit. DP is a VESA standard that is license and royalty free. However a membership in VESA is required to access the documents (starts from 5000$).

    Leave a comment:


  • torsionbar28
    replied
    Originally posted by kaprikawn View Post
    Is DP also encumbered with the crappy licensing/costs that HDMI has?
    No, DP is free AFAIK.

    Leave a comment:


  • kaprikawn
    replied
    Is DP also encumbered with the crappy licensing/costs that HDMI has?

    Leave a comment:


  • torsionbar28
    replied
    Originally posted by SyXbiT View Post
    I'm not an expert, so I'm happy to be corrected. It used to be that DVI was for monitors, and HDMI (because it could carry sound) was for TVs. Then DVI got support for sound. Then DisplayPort replaced DVI.

    DisplayPort and HDMI both transfer sound/video and are both fairly small in size (both have mini ports as well), and both handle really high refresh rates and resolutions.
    Are there pros/cons that make one better suited to TV or Monitor, or do we have two similar standards just for historical reasons?
    HDMI, which replaced component (Y Pb Pr) video, is for consumer living room devices.

    DisplayPort, which replaced DVI, is for computers. (DVI was video-only, it never had the ability to carry audio).
    Last edited by torsionbar28; 06-26-2019, 01:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SyXbiT
    replied
    I'm not an expert, so I'm happy to be corrected. It used to be that DVI was for monitors, and HDMI (because it could carry sound) was for TVs. Then DVI got support for sound. Then DisplayPort replaced DVI.

    DisplayPort and HDMI both transfer sound/video and are both fairly small in size (both have mini ports as well), and both handle really high refresh rates and resolutions.
    Are there pros/cons that make one better suited to TV or Monitor, or do we have two similar standards just for historical reasons?

    Leave a comment:


  • DisplayPort 2.0 Published For 3x Increase In Data Bandwidth Performance

    Phoronix: DisplayPort 2.0 Published For 3x Increase In Data Bandwidth Performance

    VESA announced their first major update to the DisplayPort interface in three years...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-2.0-Published
Working...
X