Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

20-Way AMD / NVIDIA Linux Gaming Benchmarks For The 2018 Holidays

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    nice to see my card dominating in performance per dollar

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by pal666 View Post
      nice to see my card dominating in performance per dollar
      Like as the beginning...?!

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by bofh80
        Is there any proper write up somewhere for getting amdgpu with a rx 570 (or similar model) up and running on fedora 29 (28 at worst) ?
        580 (similar model) works out of the box. like install fedora, boot, it works

        Comment


        • #14
          I feel spoiled for having so many cards with open source drivers are hitting > 60FPS on 1080p. Loving it!

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by bofh80
            Is there any proper write up somewhere for getting amdgpu with a rx 570 (or similar model) up and running on fedora 29 (28 at worst) ?

            I've followed that and verified by grub boot entries. amdgpu.ppfeaturemask=0xffffffff amdgpu.dc=1 amdgpu.dpm=1
            For some reason my card is stuck on the 300mhz entry. I've used watman-gtk (hence ppfeaturemask) to verify. I haven't tried to apply any wattman settings as I don't want misconfigure anything further. I'm assuming on default values clock gating should work out of the box.
            I've had the exact same problem on my RX 470.
            When using the feature mask boot parameter clocks are stuck at 300MHz on 4.18

            Thanks to a good fellow on these very forums, the workaround seems to be :
            echo "1" | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_sclk_od
            echo "1" | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_mclk_od
            And voilà, your card should be running normally.

            You can than overclock through p-states:


            FYI I've been able to push my RX 470 to 1350MHz/1750MHz at stock voltages.
            Didn't try to go higher yet.

            Comment


            • #16
              Is it not time to benchmark COMBOS?
              Freesync + AMD vs G-sync + Nvidia
              And their combo price range and performance per dollar in combos
              At least until there will be crossed drivers, if they ever be

              As Freesync monitors are cheaper ...
              would not be AMD GPUs in advantage when you are going to purchase a combo for gaming
              in 1080p as 4k is still not for gaming?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by bofh80

                In case you missed some of the random information that came after. 4.19 fixed the clock gate issue for me. i had to remove the featuremask as it was causing graphical issues. But the wattman output now seems to suggest a different mask to what I was using.
                Hello bofh80 and gurv,

                please have a look @ amd-staging-drm-next
                commit #29bf84e646c45b3370b640d44c0ce454ecb845c3
                drm/amd/pp: handle negative values when reading OD

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by mitcoes View Post
                  Is it not time to benchmark COMBOS?
                  Freesync + AMD vs G-sync + Nvidia
                  And their combo price range and performance per dollar in combos
                  At least until there will be crossed drivers, if they ever be

                  As Freesync monitors are cheaper ...
                  would not be AMD GPUs in advantage when you are going to purchase a combo for gaming
                  in 1080p as 4k is still not for gaming?
                  I have a few FreeSync 4K displays and will talk more about them when the DRM bits are merged. I have no G-SYNC displays nor plans/budget to get any anytime soon.
                  Michael Larabel
                  https://www.michaellarabel.com/

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Michael it seems like RX 560 is lost in perf/$ charts.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Michael you ignored my comment. The RX 560 is lost in perf/$ chart, despite fact it was in all test results.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X