Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

20-Way AMD / NVIDIA Linux Gaming Benchmarks For The 2018 Holidays

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
    nice to see my card dominating in performance per dollar
    Like as the beginning...?!

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by bofh80 View Post
      Is there any proper write up somewhere for getting amdgpu with a rx 570 (or similar model) up and running on fedora 29 (28 at worst) ?
      580 (similar model) works out of the box. like install fedora, boot, it works

      Comment


      • #23
        I feel spoiled for having so many cards with open source drivers are hitting > 60FPS on 1080p. Loving it!

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Jabberwocky View Post
          I feel spoiled for having so many cards with open source drivers are hitting > 60FPS on 1080p. Loving it!
          after finally getting it working properly I can say the same. cranked everything to max /enabled all optional graphics options in cs:go 1080p. (vsync) and get smooth 60fps. tho i feel it would be slightly smoother if i set the clock to high as it seems to bob up and down like a yo yo. i looked at the code and it seems that the clock is updated and every single acpi event call. seems a bit insane.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by bofh80 View Post
            Is there any proper write up somewhere for getting amdgpu with a rx 570 (or similar model) up and running on fedora 29 (28 at worst) ?
            https://doc.fedora-fr.org/wiki/Carte...pilotes_libres
            I've followed that and verified by grub boot entries. amdgpu.ppfeaturemask=0xffffffff amdgpu.dc=1 amdgpu.dpm=1
            For some reason my card is stuck on the 300mhz entry. I've used watman-gtk (hence ppfeaturemask) to verify. I haven't tried to apply any wattman settings as I don't want misconfigure anything further. I'm assuming on default values clock gating should work out of the box.
            I've had the exact same problem on my RX 470.
            When using the feature mask boot parameter clocks are stuck at 300MHz on 4.18

            Thanks to a good fellow on these very forums, the workaround seems to be :
            echo "1" | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_sclk_od
            echo "1" | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_mclk_od
            And voilĂ , your card should be running normally.

            You can than overclock through p-states:
            https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...U#Overclocking

            FYI I've been able to push my RX 470 to 1350MHz/1750MHz at stock voltages.
            Didn't try to go higher yet.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by gurv View Post

              I've had the exact same problem on my RX 470.
              When using the feature mask boot parameter clocks are stuck at 300MHz on 4.18

              Thanks to a good fellow on these very forums, the workaround seems to be :
              echo "1" | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_sclk_od
              echo "1" | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_mclk_od
              And voilĂ , your card should be running normally.

              You can than overclock through p-states:
              https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...U#Overclocking

              FYI I've been able to push my RX 470 to 1350MHz/1750MHz at stock voltages.
              Didn't try to go higher yet.
              In case you missed some of the random information that came after. 4.19 fixed the clock gate issue for me. i had to remove the featuremask as it was causing graphical issues. But the wattman output now seems to suggest a different mask to what I was using.

              Comment


              • #27
                Is it not time to benchmark COMBOS?
                Freesync + AMD vs G-sync + Nvidia
                And their combo price range and performance per dollar in combos
                At least until there will be crossed drivers, if they ever be

                As Freesync monitors are cheaper ...
                would not be AMD GPUs in advantage when you are going to purchase a combo for gaming
                in 1080p as 4k is still not for gaming?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by bofh80 View Post

                  In case you missed some of the random information that came after. 4.19 fixed the clock gate issue for me. i had to remove the featuremask as it was causing graphical issues. But the wattman output now seems to suggest a different mask to what I was using.
                  Hello bofh80 and gurv,

                  please have a look @ amd-staging-drm-next
                  commit #29bf84e646c45b3370b640d44c0ce454ecb845c3
                  drm/amd/pp: handle negative values when reading OD

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by mitcoes View Post
                    Is it not time to benchmark COMBOS?
                    Freesync + AMD vs G-sync + Nvidia
                    And their combo price range and performance per dollar in combos
                    At least until there will be crossed drivers, if they ever be

                    As Freesync monitors are cheaper ...
                    would not be AMD GPUs in advantage when you are going to purchase a combo for gaming
                    in 1080p as 4k is still not for gaming?
                    I have a few FreeSync 4K displays and will talk more about them when the DRM bits are merged. I have no G-SYNC displays nor plans/budget to get any anytime soon.
                    Michael Larabel
                    http://www.michaellarabel.com/

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Michael it seems like RX 560 is lost in perf/$ charts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X