No more 1080p results? Also I can't wait for NIR-path to mature .
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Radeon GPUs Are Increasingly Competing With NVIDIA GPUs On Latest RadeonSI/RADV Drivers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by xxmitsu View PostNo more 1080p results? Also I can't wait for NIR-path to mature .Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleyska View Post
we're talking drivers, not hardware.
we know the hardware is well, not progressed at all and I think Raja can be easily blamed for not delivering anything in 4 years.
Drivers are good, impressive and improving at a good pace.
Still. I find it impressive, Vega beats a 1080 Ti at anything, or even come close to it.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Most interseting always to me is that 1080 Ti is so much better than plain 1080, unlike 1070 Ti to plain 1070. So, that Ti-tech seems not so much a thing, if not at the top of the line
Michael did you ever test that - Ti to non-Ti diff, I mean on 1050, 1070 and 1080... you have all these models isn't it?
Originally posted by Nexusband View Post
Actually, Vega is not bad at all - it's pretty decent in terms of "workstation usage". It's just absolute crap in terms of Gaming.
This is not today or because of Raja, workstation or something, that Ti-tech specials where correctness is not requirement (such as gaming) exist since GeForce 2 AFAIR
It is kind of saying how normal nVidia cards are "absolute crap in terms of Gaming", just because Ti versions exists... i know some like to call normal nVidia non-Ti as SE to even better describe these normal but crippled editionsLast edited by dungeon; 19 March 2018, 05:40 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by torsionbar28 View PostThere is really no reason for any self respecting open-source enthusiast to run NVidia hardware any more. Sold my GTX Titan last year, replacing it with an Rx 480 and have not looked back. All my Steam games play really smoothly on Ultimate settings. Everything just works, and works really well - no more binary blobs or proprietary kernel modules to compile. AMD FTW!
If a 390x/480/580 becomes available for under $150, I would likely make the switch. I am actually hoping the mining all busts, and the market is flooded with used mining cards, and I can pick one up for under $100.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael View Post
With the range of GPUs tested for this article, in most games they are CPU bound at 1080p.Last edited by xxmitsu; 19 March 2018, 05:20 PM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by treba View PostReally impressive. I always wonder what kind of patented stuff nvidia and amd have in their proprietary drivers that make it impossible to open source them. It doesn't seem to be that much of an advantage anymore
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostMost interseting always to me is that 1080 Ti is so much better than plain 1080, unlike 1070 Ti to plain 1070. So, that Ti-tech seems not so much a thing, if not at the top of the line
Michael did you ever test that - Ti to non-Ti diff, I mean on 1050, 1070 and 1080... you have all these models isn't it?
I think these Ti-tricks are nowdays most obvious, bigger the GPU became TI-tricks seems works more and more better
This is not today or because of Raja, workstation or something, that Ti-tech specials where correctness is not requirement (such as gaming) exist since GeForce 2 AFAIR
It is kind of saying how normal nVidia cards are "absolute crap in terms of Gaming", just because Ti versions exists... i know some like to call normal nVidia non-Ti as SE to even better describe these normal but crippled editions
The Vega is absolute crap in terms of gaming, because first, it took AMD so long to get them out on the market and second, they have been totally "miss-optimized". In terms of raw performance the 64 is miles ahead of the 1080 Ti. But they suck more power, because of that miss optimisation.
- Likes 4
Comment
Comment