Originally posted by rabcor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Compute Stick Performance Surprises Under Ubuntu Linux
Collapse
X
-
-
I'm not so impressed by this. The only interesting comparison was actually against the nvidia tk1, which is a quad cortex-a15. What I read from the tests is that it LOST as much as it WON against that competitor, which realistically puts it ON PAR with a LAST generation 32bit ARM... which will be obliterated by a CURRENT generation ARMv8 with an equal core count.
Leave a comment:
-
I believe that the compute stick has a recovery partition for reinstalling linux if things go wrong. Do you know if it is possible to download the recovery files/image if the stick's own copy gets corrupted?
Also, did you compile your kernel 4.1 with any special flags?
thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Color me impressed, those are impressive specs and more impressive performance for such a tiny computer. One wonders how the hell they fit 2GB of memory and a quad core processor into that tiny thing without it always being overheating. Not to mention it could perform this well on very low power. I want it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by curaga View PostMichael, ever since you did the mobile CSS changes a few weeks ago, big system spec tables have caused horizontal scrolling. This article has a particularly wide table...
not sure what the difference is.Last edited by duby229; 01 June 2015, 05:30 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Michael, ever since you did the mobile CSS changes a few weeks ago, big system spec tables have caused horizontal scrolling. This article has a particularly wide table...
Leave a comment:
-
People should remember that the tested mac mini is much faster than the slowest low end models. This ain't so bad
Leave a comment:
-
Intel Compute Stick Performance Surprises Under Ubuntu Linux
Phoronix: Intel Compute Stick Performance Surprises Under Ubuntu Linux
Since last week I've been testing the Intel Compute Stick, the quad-core Atom Z3735F Atom powered PC that's a little bigger than the size of an HDMI connector. In this article are some benchmarks of this $150 quad-core + 32GB eMMC + 2GB RAM tiny computer in a variety of benchmarks comparing it to other low-power x86 and ARMv7 hardware.
Tags: None
Leave a comment: