Originally posted by uid313
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB SATA 3.0 SSD
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by GreatEmerald View PostThat's very nice to hear. That's one of the SSD models I was considering as well, but unfortunately the store was out of stock...
Comment
-
Originally posted by JS987 View PostMost SSDs are garbage
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/1...flash-ssd-data
Did you the paper linked in that post? What they did was essentially testing how the drives would respond to 3000 power failures in a row. Seriously, three-freaking-key. If you really care about data integrity, one is too many (that's why you'll never see a server rack without a UPS standing next to it).
SSDs are the best thing that happened to personal computing since cheap RAM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by prodigy_ View PostI don't know how Michael got those test results
Originally posted by Licaon View PostRegarding Kingston V300 read this post by Maxgadgetguy: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answer....html#11492819
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Licaon View Postwhat?
v5.0.5 Sandforce version made in Taiwan. This unit will always benchmark just finedramatic difference in performance between China or Taiwan-made models
Comment
-
Originally posted by prodigy_ View PostIDK, on my own Intel 520 I get 550 MB/s sequential reads in AS-SSD. Both drives have the same SandForce SF-2281 controller. What gives?
Originally posted by TAXI View PostDid you read the link you posted?
Comment
-
Originally posted by TAXI View Postmost likely Michael has other results cause he has the Taiwan version while prodigy_
So I wouldn't recommend Kingston. If you need something cheap and don't really care about write speed, go for Crucial M500.
Comment
Comment