Qualcomm Bringing Snapdragon X Series To Mini PCs For As Little As ~$600 USD

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67050

    Qualcomm Bringing Snapdragon X Series To Mini PCs For As Little As ~$600 USD

    Phoronix: Qualcomm Bringing Snapdragon X Series To Mini PCs For As Little As ~$600 USD

    Following last year's launch of Qualcomm Snapdragon X1 powered laptops, Qualcomm is using CES 2025 this week in Las Vegas for promoting the Snapdragon X Series for mini desktop form factor PCs. But the Linux support and performance out of these forthcoming Snapdragon X Platform mini PCs remain to be seen...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • Danny3
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 2306

    #2
    Without first class support for Linux, it's garbage!
    Fuck them!
    Can barely wait for CES to start to write a few comments about this on other social platforms too.

    Comment

    • ayumu
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 613

      #3
      Not RISC-V, so why even bother.

      Comment

      • sophisticles
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2015
        • 2521

        #4
        Originally posted by Danny3 View Post
        Without first class support for Linux, it's garbage!
        Fuck them!
        Qualcomm is a Platinum member of the Linux Foundation:

        Linux Foundation members help support the development of shared technology resources while accelerating their own innovation through open source.


        Platinum membership costs 500k a year and Qualcomm is a regular contributor to the Linux kernel.

        This leaves us with one of two possibilities as to why full Linux support is not available for these devices:

        1) There may be something inherently incompatible between the way Linux is structured that makes it very difficult to support this hardware.

        2) There is no significant demand in the market for Linux support on these devices.

        I tend to favor the second possibility, the free market usually decides what gets adopted and what doesn't.

        Comment

        • carguello2
          Phoronix Member
          • Oct 2023
          • 51

          #5
          Originally posted by sophisticles View Post

          2) There is no significant demand in the market for Linux support on these devices.
          This is it.

          Comment

          • Phil995511
            Phoronix Member
            • Aug 2021
            • 95

            #6
            It's 30% more expensive than the AMD mini PC I've just bought. And when it comes to operating systems and software, the ARM offer is really very light in comparison.

            Offering machines based on ARM CPUs is a nice idea, but not at such prices !!

            If they want to sell their machines, they need to be at least 30 % cheaper than the cheapest x86 PC in the same category. Because nobody, or almost nobody, will want to pay such a price for a machine with which, in comparison, you can't do much...

            Comment

            • NateHubbard
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2015
              • 575

              #7
              Originally posted by Phil995511 View Post
              It's 30% more expensive than the AMD mini PC I've just bought.
              Yeah, I have a low end 8 core AMD chip with 64gb of ram and a couple of SSDs installed. I imagine one of these Qualcomm devices is going to be an expensive downgrade. If they were standardized better, it would help a lot. A mini-itx board with ram slots and pci-e ports would be a good start.

              Comment

              • loganj
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2017
                • 603

                #8
                Michael you should put quota to As Little As

                Comment

                • schmidtbag
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 6599

                  #9
                  Originally posted by carguello2 View Post
                  This is it.
                  This is a chicken and egg situation.
                  ARM SBCs have proven for years to have a stronger Linux community than Windows. The demand would go up if there was proper support. Raspberry Pi is wildly successful despite being mediocre even by ARM standards, and it's not the best value option either. The only reason RPis are so successful is because it's very well supported. I wouldn't be surprised if Qualcomm could have seen better success trying to be a high-end competitor to RPi, rather than failing multiple times trying to get a desirable Windows ARM experience.

                  Comment

                  • openminded
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2022
                    • 220

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Phil995511 View Post
                    It's 30% more expensive than the AMD mini PC I've just bought. And when it comes to operating systems and software, the ARM offer is really very light in comparison.

                    Offering machines based on ARM CPUs is a nice idea, but not at such prices !!

                    If they want to sell their machines, they need to be at least 30 % cheaper than the cheapest x86 PC in the same category. Because nobody, or almost nobody, will want to pay such a price for a machine with which, in comparison, you can't do much...
                    What's their rationale for such a high price tag then I wonder? Or they're just relying on promotion and advertising? Well Apple fans won't quit loving Apple whatever any other company would do. Windows users are conservative in general, so no major numbers of switchers from that side too, esp given current pros and cons of such decision. This could be a good fit for enthusiastic crowd of geeks but the lack of Linux support and questionable price tag can hardly convince many people to move onto a new architecture. And what's left (that could have worked) is only brainwashing commercials and so on but will that bring them a lot of new loyal customers? I doubt it will.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X