Originally posted by filssavi
View Post
Yes, ISO 26262 is painful for rather simple projects and doing it for the Linux kernel would be "more painful" (understatement of the year). However, ISO 26262 is for components, e.g. that the motor applies the correct torque, or that your barkes stop the car.
In this context, ISO 26262 does not allow adaptive controls or machine learning in any shape of form for high ASIL. Hence, these two concepts don't mix.
I don't know anyone that tries to certify an autonomous "kernels" through functional safety certification because -by definition- autonomous driving admits unexplored failures (accidents).
Separately, there is no such thing as an autonomous today, we are just discussing levels of autonomy (despite the attention-grabbing headlines..)
PS. to my knowledge ISO 26262 is also voluntary in the sense that you can sell a car without it. Car OEMs just require it from their Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers.
Leave a comment: