Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W Benchmarks - Nice For $15

[torsionbar28]

Holding doors open? Perhaps preventing vehicles from rolling down the driveway?

And probably still feeling inadequate next to the faster AMD Athlon and Athlon64 competition!

[anarki2]

Nice, if you have nothing better to do with your money, and you also like industrial junk. There's zero practical use case for this device.

[kylew77]

I am curious as to what OS you are running on those old machines.
The slow and bloated software of today wont be a pleasant experience.

Believe it or not I installed Gentoo over several days with fluxbox as the wm to get the memory usage low. I never update them. They are for an emergency of if a family member needs a computer to access the Internet or something and they need it NOW. Too slow for day to day usage.

[PerformanceExpert]

Does anybody know to which Intel CPU the original RPI Zero compare ?
Is it 486 or better ?

There isn't really a direct x86 equivalent. Performance would be similar to a 400MHz Pentium II. The 486 only did 100MHz but would need to be clocked well above 1GHz to achieve similar performance.

[Raka555]

Does anybody know to which Intel CPU the original RPI Zero compare ?
Is it 486 or better ?

[Raka555]

This little sucker has more RAM, more cores, and probably a better scores than my old Pentium 3 and Pentium 4 systems I keep for emergencies in the closet. Truly marvelous to see where we have gone.

I am curious as to what OS you are running on those old machines.
The slow and bloated software of today wont be a pleasant experience.

[Mike Frett]

I still think the RAM should have been upgraded to 1GB. Would've been perfect.

[PerformanceExpert]

Seems a like a neat little do it all SBC in what used to be microcontroller board form factor.
As for the RISC-V chip, ouch. Definitely needs those vector instructions and compiler optimisations to compete.

Yeah, a $15 board using the 9 year old A53 at just 1GHz giving U74 a hard time is not exactly a great selling point for RISC-V... While optimizations are always possible, the same applies to Arm (eg. this board runs 32-bit code, while 64-bit is 10-15% faster). And RISC-V has issues that cannot be worked around in the compiler (such as no conditional execution, load/store with indexing or writeback).

[NateHubbard]

my old Pentium 3 and Pentium 4 systems I keep for emergencies in the closet.

Holding doors open? Perhaps preventing vehicles from rolling down the driveway?

[abu_shawarib]

Seems a like a neat little do it all SBC in what used to be microcontroller board form factor.
As for the RISC-V chip, ouch. Definitely needs those vector instructions and compiler optimisations to compete.