Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB NVMe Linux SSD Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
OpenBenchmarking.org, Phoronix Test Suite, Linux benchmarking, automated benchmarking, benchmarking results, benchmarking repository, open source benchmarking, benchmarking test profiles
I tried to compare the Samsung SM961 in the NUC8i5BEH. The test ran for 4 hours and I used the computer during the test.
One write test failed to run. I have Fedora 29 with the XFCE spin installed at the moment.
I paid more than double for this NVME ssd compared to what it and competing drives cost now. If I made a purchase today it would probably be for the following:
Buy Silicon Power P34A60 M.2 2280 128GB PCI-Express 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.3 TLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) SP128GBP34A60M28 with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Once you know, you Newegg!
I think the SP256GBP34A80M28 is the same as the MyDigitalSSD BPX Pro with a cheaper price.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by edwaleni View PostOn the Sqlite issue, there are several cases online where DBA's have noticed that certain implementations of TRIM do not like delayed writes of inserts. They prefer the insert be written each time rather than grouped.
I am not a DBA, but I have heard about various SSD models having database write back issues.
Perhaps this is what the Samsung models are struggling with.
could be great to have an fio benchmark with --sync=1 .
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ssam View PostCould we get a Crucial P1 included in the next round of NVMe PCIe tests? It would be interesting to see how a budget option compares.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Could we get a Crucial P1 included in the next round of NVMe PCIe tests? It would be interesting to see how a budget option compares.
Leave a comment:
-
On the Sqlite issue, there are several cases online where DBA's have noticed that certain implementations of TRIM do not like delayed writes of inserts. They prefer the insert be written each time rather than grouped.
I am not a DBA, but I have heard about various SSD models having database write back issues.
Perhaps this is what the Samsung models are struggling with.
Leave a comment:
-
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB NVMe Linux SSD Benchmarks
Phoronix: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB NVMe Linux SSD Benchmarks
Announced at the end of January was the Samsung 970 EVO Plus as the first consumer-grade solid-state drive with 96-layer 3D NAND memory. The Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSDs are now shipping and in this review are the first Linux benchmarks of these new SSDs in the form of the Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB MZ-V7S500B/AM compared to several other SSDs on Linux.
Tags: None
- Likes 2
Leave a comment: