1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The GNOME View On Compositor Benchmarking

GNOME

Published on 13 June 2011 09:46 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in GNOME
11 Comments

Red Hat's Owen Taylor who is largely responsible for the work on the GNOME Shell and Mutter has written his response to the recent article about How Unity, Compiz, GNOME Shell and KWin Affect Performance.

Owen's comments on his blog are pretty much as expected and come down to attributing the shortcomings of GNOME Shell / Mutter with not handling undirected full-screen rendering at this point.
Adel Gadllah has had patches for Mutter and GNOME Shell to add unredirection for over a year, but I’ve dragged my feet on landing them, because there were some questions about when it’s appropriate to unredirect a window and when not that I wasn’t sure we had fully answered. We want to unredirect fullscreen 3D games, but not necessarily all fullscreen windows. For example, a fullscreen Firefox window is much like any other window and can have separate dialog windows floating above it that need compositing manager interaction to draw properly.

We should land some sort of unredirection soon to benefit 3D gamers, but really, I’m much more interested in compositing manager performance in situations where the compositing manager actually has to composite.

This is where KDE's Kwin now does suspended compositing. Coming as a result of Owen's investigation though is a new benchmark to measure the effect of the compositing manager on the application re-draw performance. In Owen's blog he goes into more details about the application re-draw process and what his benchmark is doing. He also has some initial results comparing KWin, Compiz, and Mutter. He also looks at the affects of not compositing and off-screen rendering.
My goal here is that this is a benchmark that we can all use to figure out the right timing algorithms and get them implemented across compositors. At that point, I’d expect to see only minimal differences, because the basic work that every compositor has to do is the same: just copy the area that the application updated to the screen and let the application start drawing the next frame.

A Phoronix Test Suite test profile for this xcompbench program is likely to come.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Open-Source Radeon Graphics Have Some Improvements On Linux 3.17
  2. CPUFreq Scaling Tests With AMD's Kaveri On Linux 3.16
  3. Enabling HyperZ Is Still An Easy Way For Faster RadeonSI Performance
  4. AMD Kaveri: Catalyst vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Qt5 Will Now Support LGPLv3 Modules
  2. Proposed: A Tainted Performance State For The Linux Kernel
  3. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  4. Mesa 10.2.6 Has Plenty Of OpenGL Driver Bug Fixes
  5. LXQt 0.8 Is Being Released Soon
  6. Linux 3.17 Lands Memfd, A KDBUS Prerequisite
  7. Humble Jumbo Bundle 2 Shafts Linux Gamers
  8. New VM Software Claims To Be 4.5x Faster Than QEMU
  9. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  10. Mesa Now Supports Another OpenGL 4.5 Extension
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  2. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  3. Dead Island for Linux (?)
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. AMD Offers Mantle For OpenGL-Next, Pushes Mantle To Workstations
  6. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  7. OpenGL 4.5 Released With New Features
  8. Updated graphics drivers for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise LTS