Defining Wayland & Its Input System Are Discussed

Posted by Michael Larabel on January 27, 2011

If you have any interest at all in the technical side of the Wayland Display Server, there's been two mailing list threads in particular worth paying attention to this week. One is about proposals for Wayland's input system an the other is in terms of defining a Wayland implementation.

The most recent input discussion for Wayland was initiated by Canonical's Chase Douglas by proposing (in this message) to design an input system that is backwards compatible with previous input systems, can be developed to work along with X, and can be integrated into the same display server source code. Chase expressed interest in separating the input system entirely from the display system via what would be a new project called "Inland" or the like. But that separation was quickly shut down by some, like Intel's Jesse Barnes, for overly complicating the matter and causing other engineering headaches. This matter is still being discussed.

The other thread worth reading was started by Tiago Vignatti and is entitled wayland implementation conformance. This thread was born out of Kristian making the following comment:
Once of the things that X got right was the extension model. Wayland takes it one step further by making everything an extension: the only thing that's fixed in the Wayland protocol is an interface for discovering other interfaces. If it turns out that we need to update the input model, we have versioning built in for incremental updates, and we can add an entire new model if we need to start from scratch.

So what exactly defines a Wayland implementation? Kristian's answer is below, but this thread is still being discussed with various thoughts being expressed among interested contributors.
That's a good question. My intention is to have wayland.xml be the official interfaces, but you're right that the drm interface is specific to the Linux drm driver model and maybe that should be split out into its own file. Additionally, it would make sense to abstract out the wl_buffer creation into a library that server and client can link to so that not every toolkit and application that use the wayland protocol directly will have to know about every driver specific interface for creating and sharing buffers.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  2. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  3. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  4. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  5. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  6. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  7. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  8. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  9. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  10. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  11. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
Latest Forum Talk
  1. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  2. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  3. Ubuntu 13.10 Likely Switching To Chromium Browser
  4. KDE's Krita Ported To OpenGL 3.1, OpenGL ES 2.0
  5. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  6. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite