1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Fedora Core Package Cleaning

Fedora

Published on 13 May 2006 01:00 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Fedora
Comment On This Article

Will Woods of Red Hat has announced on the Red Hat announcement list the start of a Fedora Core package cleanup project. The intentions of this cleaning are to improve the quality of the Fedora Core RPM packages -- to get them to a higher standard, similar to the Fedora Extras repository with Mock building.

I'm announcing the start of a new QA project, and I'm asking for your
help. 

In the past, Core packages have not been held to the same standards as
Extras. We want to fix this! We're starting by cleaning up the spec
files so that Core packages can all be built using Mock. (If you aren't
familiar with Mock, it's a cool RPM build tool that we use to build
Fedora Extras.)

This is where you come in: We need people to attempt Mock builds of
Fedora Core packages, and file bugs when they find packages that don't
build. 

Doing so will earn you the thanks and respect of your peers, but as an
added incentive we're going to give away free stuff (!) to people who
help out.

Filing a bug on a broken package will earn you one Karma Point. If you
include a patch that makes that package build successfully, you'll get
five Karma Points. These will be redeemable for cool stuff from the Red
Hat Cool Stuff Store (at an exchange rate to be determined once we
figure out how much stuff we're actually allowed to give away  :) 

For more info, check out:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires

Ok? OK! Let's get testin'!

-w


About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  3. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  4. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 20-Way Radeon Comparison With Open-Source Graphics For Steam On Linux Gaming
  2. Preview: OS X 10.10 Yosemite vs. Ubuntu Linux GPU Performance
  3. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  4. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
Latest Linux News
  1. Google Chrome 37 Brings Many Security Fixes
  2. MenuetOS Updated With SMP Threads & Onscreen Keyboard
  3. Mesa Has A New Release Manager
  4. Enlightenment E19 Lands Its New Wayland Compositor Code
  5. Nouveau Turns Into A Mess In Latest Linux 3.17 + Mesa 10.3-dev Tests
  6. New GCC 5.0 Changes, Command-Line Options That Landed So Far
  7. SteamOS Update 133 Has Better Intel Performance, VA-API
  8. DRM Graphics Changes For Linux 3.18 Might End Up Being Smaller
  9. Ioquake3 Works On Finally Switching Over To SDL2
  10. Linux 3.17-rc2 Release Celebrates 23 Years Of Linux
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  3. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage
  4. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  5. Chinese People Try To Patent Wine On ARM
  6. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  7. "The World's Most Highly-Assured OS" Kernel Open-Sourced
  8. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?