1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Canonical's X Gesture Extension Being Re-Evaluated

X.Org

Published on 28 August 2010 12:43 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
10 Comments

Earlier this month Canonical introduced its own multi-touch framework for Ubuntu that is set to premiere with Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" and it's called UTouch and is joined by their own gesture/touch language. That same day as announcing UTouch for Ubuntu that will support devices like the Apple Magic TrackPad and Dell XT2, Canonical proposed the X.Org Gesture Extension to the X.Org development community. While it's good to see Canonical making more contributions to upstream projects that it depends upon for Ubuntu Linux, the X.Org Gesture Extension is already being re-evaluated and may in fact not be needed.

Since Canonical's Chase Douglas published his xorg-devel email in which he laid out their proposed specification for X.Org Gesture Extension protocol v1.0, there's been some dissenting opinions by X.Org developers about how the gesture recognition should be handled. Part of this proposed gesture extension provides an interface for X clients to register and receive gesture primitive events and X clients to then act as a gesture engine. Canonical is of the belief that the gesture handling should be handled server-side by X while the X.Org developers -- such as Kristian Høgsberg and MPX-creator Peter Hutterer -- want this input gesture recognition to be handled client-side out of the X.Org Server.

In a new email by Chase, Canonical justifies the gesture recognition per the X.Org Gesture Extension proposal to be handled within the server for the following reasons: 1. With handling of input events (touches) that may span multiple windows, but the recognized gesture event is supposed to only affect the first window, the X.Org Server shouldn't be firing off the input events to any other windows. 2. If the handling is done by the client, there's also the possibility the recognition would occur twice -- once by the window manager and then again by any window clients that may want to recognize their own input events. Canonical admits though that if this task were to be performed twice there would be little in the way of latency problems. 3. Lastly, multi-touch events are not exposed to the client in the X.Org Server used by Ubuntu 10.10, where Canonical wants this first cut of UTouch / X.Org Gesture Extension to be deployed.

The common position against having the gesture recognition engine in the X Server and instead on the client-side (such as within the window manager instead), can be summarized by Carsten Haitzler with "I absolutely agree with peter on this. Frankly the problem is that input from a mouse, or a tablet or multiple touch-points is ambiguous. You may be painting in GIMP - not trying to "swipe to scroll". I can go on with examples (dragging a slider inside a scrollable area as opposed to wanting to scroll with a drag). Only the client has enough detailed knowledge of the window contents, application mode etc. To possibly make a reliable guess as to which one to do. It's X's job to provide as much device input to the client as it needs in a sane digestible way to make such a decision, but... that's [in my honest opinion] where the server's job ends."

Chase does acknowledge, "It's true that the logic behind point one may be perfectly fine, but having recognition through X inserts a lot of extra code into the server. If we are content with touches being split up into window regions before recognition occurs, then we may be able to get around the need for the X Gesture extension completely. The window manager use case could be supplied through input grabbing and event replaying."

We will see how this ongoing architectural debate ends, but for Ubuntu 10.10 at least it will be handled server-side.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  2. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  3. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
  4. AMD Radeon R9 285 Tonga Performance On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  2. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
  3. Btrfs RAID HDD Testing On Ubuntu Linux 14.10
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 Linux 32-bit vs. 64-bit Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. GTK+ Lands Experimental Backend For Mir Display Server
  2. Ubuntu 14.10 Officially Released
  3. Mesa 10.4 Might Re-Enable HyperZ For R600g/RadeonSI
  4. Intel GVT-g GPU Virtualization Moves Closer
  5. GTK+ 3.16 To Bring Several New Features
  6. Debian 8.0 Jessie Has Many Multimedia Improvements
  7. What Linux Benchmarks Would You Like To See Next?
  8. Open-Source, Linux Support For Corsair Link Devices Slowly Materializing
  9. Cairo-Dock 3.4 Shows A Lot Of Progress, Works Toward EGL/Wayland Support
  10. Mesa 10.4 Tentatively Planned For Early December
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  2. Advertisements On Phoronix
  3. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  6. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed