1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Phoronix Test Suite 2.6 "Lyngen" Beta 2 Is Here

Phoronix

Published on 06 May 2010 10:29 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Phoronix
Comment On This Article

For those looking to run any sort of automated benchmarks on Linux, Mac OS X, OpenSolaris, BSD, or even Windows 7 x64, the beta 2 release of Phoronix Test Suite 2.6 "Lygen" has been released this morning.

This newest release is coming just over a week since the first beta, but there's a good amount of changes within this release that will be finalized by month's end. There are various fixes to pts-core, continued improvements on the new PTS Results Viewer interface, individualized result tables, chart improvements, and other enhancements.

When it comes to test profiles for the Phoronix Test Suite there is a network-loopback test profile that's a benchmark of the Ethernet loopback interface on Linux, a test profile for phpbench, IOzone test profile compatibility on Windows (see today's EXT4 vs. NTFS benchmarks), and other profile tweaks.

With the results viewer for the Phoronix Test Suite, there are now individualized tables (in addition to the "overview table" that has long been available) to accompany each graph that shows the standard deviation, the difference(s) between other test runs, and other features as shown in the tables in our recent Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu article.

Phoronix Test Suite 2.6 "Lyngen" Beta 2 Is Here


The latest release of Phoronix Test Suite 2.6 can be downloaded at Phoronix-Test-Suite.com. As always, we invite any bug reports, feature requests, and other feedback on this newest release.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  2. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  3. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  4. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  5. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  6. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  7. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  8. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  9. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
  10. VC4 Gallium3D Driver Now Handles X With GLAMOR
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  2. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  3. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  4. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign