1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Discussing Mesa's "Stupid Development Model"

Mesa

Published on 30 April 2010 07:19 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Mesa
11 Comments

Red Hat's David Airlie has started a new mailing list discussion that's surrounding the "stupid development model" of Mesa. Their accepted policy of developing in stable branches and then pulling the code into the master code-base periodically (rather than just working directly on master) is causing many frustrations for Dave in being able to back-port fixes to existing stable branches of Mesa.

Actually there are now two mailing list discussions surrounding the matter. The original thread appears to have been abandoned after several Mesa developers were upset with the tone of Airlie's message and it coming across as rather offensive. As a result, a new thread was started. Brian Paul, the founder of Mesa, has responded with his view on the situation, which is worth reading, whereby he is trying to push the largest number of bug-fixes into stable branches of Mesa.

At the moment there are some possible changes being discussed such as having a stable release maintainer that would be responsible for pulling fixes from master into stable Mesa release series, to devise a release schedule, etc. However, no definitive changes have resulted from this discussion yet.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. A Walkthrough Of The New 32 System Open-Source Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  2. Habey MITX-6771: Mini-ITX Board With Quad-Core J1900 Bay Trail
  3. OCZ Vector 150 SSD On Linux
  4. Noctua i4 CPU Cooler: Great For Cooling High-End LGA-2011v3 CPUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 17-Way Linux Graphics Card Comparison With Civilization Beyond Earth
  2. AMD Kaveri: Open-Source Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver
  3. 12-Way AMD Catalyst 14.12 vs. NVIDIA 346 Series Linux GPU Comparison
  4. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver Brings Mixed Results For Linux Users
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel 2.99.917 X.Org Driver Released, 3.0 Release Finally Near
  2. Server-Side XCB Is Being Discussed For The X.Org Server
  3. Adreno A4xx Rendering With Freedreno Takes Shape
  4. Linux 3.19-rc1 Kernel Released Ahead Of Schedule
  5. Civilization: Beyond Earth Linux GPU/Driver Benchmarks
  6. X.Org Server 1.16.3 Released To Fix Security Issues
  7. Linux 3.19 Merge Window Closes Ahead Of Schedule
  8. MIPS R6 Architecture Now Supported By GCC
  9. LowRISC To Feature Tagged Memory & Minion Cores
  10. Intel Skylake Audio Support For Linux 3.19
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Need some hand holding with upgrading xserver
  2. Speeding up systemd networking service
  3. FPS capped on Linux (AMD fglrx drivers)
  4. Major Performance Breakthrough Discovered For Intel's Mesa Driver
  5. Looking for an nVidia GPU, but not sure how well they are supported.
  6. Are there an app using HSA ?
  7. The New SuperTuxKart Looks Better, But Can Cause GPU/Driver Problems
  8. XLennart: A Game For Systemd Haters With Nothing Better To Do