1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Soon: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.6, Oh My!

Phoronix

Published on 18 March 2010 11:40 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Phoronix
23 Comments

Just yesterday we unleashed Phoromatic 1.0 with a horde of improvements to our remote test management system and as part of that introduced the Phoromatic Ubuntu Tracker, which benchmarks Ubuntu on a daily basis looking for performance regressions across multiple systems. Earlier today we then called out for benchmarking requests as what we should track next using our testing and execution framework (so far the likely contender is seeing how Wine's performance is evolving on a per-commit basis, but let us know what you think). Now to end out this week of announcements I have something else to share that's particularly interesting.

Last November I hinted that Windows support was coming to the Phoronix Test Suite and a month later I went on a sabbatical in Germany to focus on the Windows 7 support up-bringing to this GPLv3-licensed software. Since returning there's continued to be a monumental amount of work going into the Phoronix Test Suite that benefits not only the existing Linux, *BSD, OpenSolaris, and Mac OS X support, but the forthcoming Microsoft Windows support too. With that said, it's looking like within two or three weeks the Windows support within the Phoronix Test Suite will be fully functioning and ready for official use.

Soon: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.6, Oh My!


The heart of the Phoronix Test Suite, pts-core, will be fully compatible with Windows 7 (and should work fine on older versions such as Windows Vista and XP) and there should be at least a dozen (or more) test profiles that will seamlessly (and natively) work across our Linux / BSD / OpenSolaris / Mac OS X / Windows test spectrum. This means automated, highly reproducible tests across practically every major operating system. The support will continue to be refined going forward especially as we get closer to hitting Phoronix Test Suite 3.0, but April and May should be very exciting months.

Not only will the Phoronix Test Suite run on Windows, but features like Phoronix Global and Phoromatic will work on the Microsoft OS too, since we know of no other publicly available software (let alone open-source software) that provides the depth and automated testing feature set that is available from this Phoronix software stack. Windows may not be our favorite OS, but that's no reason to deprive those users from experiencing a robust benchmarking framework and letting them be exposed to more open-source software -- as after all, most of the tests within the Phoronix Test Suite use free software components as benchmarks. Also benefiting from this work will be the Wine project as new Windows test profiles should also function under Wine with the Phoronix Test Suite thanks to Cascading Test Profiles, a feature we introduced to pts-core more than one year ago.

Following this code push, you can expect a variety of interesting articles to appear on Phoronix.com. We will certainly be delivering benchmarks that compare the performance of Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.6 and a plethora of other tests (including multi-platform graphics driver benchmarks) that can now be easily and reliably delivered across operating systems in a manner that's reproducible by anyone. We will also be using a variety of hardware in this testing.

This Windows support will be part of the forthcoming Phoronix Test Suite 2.6 "Lyngen" release, but stay tuned for more announcements.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Launches New FX CPUs, Cuts Prices On Existing Processors
  2. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  3. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ondemand vs. Performance CPU Governing For AMD FX CPUs On Linux 3.17
  2. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  3. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  4. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
Latest Linux News
  1. Borderlands 2 Is Coming To Linux
  2. The Witcher 2 Ups The Performance More & Works Around Catalyst Bug
  3. Running Gallium3D's LLVMpipe On The Eight-Core 5GHz CPU
  4. Trying Intel OpenCL On Linux For Video Encoding
  5. GSoC 2014 Yielded Some Improvements For Mesa/X.Org This Year
  6. webOS Lives On As LuneOS With New Release
  7. Marek Lands Radeon Gallium3D HyperZ Improvements
  8. Mozilla Firefox 32 Surfaces With HTML5, Developer Changes
  9. Nouveau X.Org Driver Released With DRI3+Present, Maxwell, GLAMOR
  10. Microsoft & AMD Release C++ AMP Compiler With Linux Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  3. AMD graphics doesn't work with AMD Catalyst drivers
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. SSD seems slow