1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Soon: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.6, Oh My!

Phoronix

Published on 18 March 2010 11:40 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Phoronix
23 Comments

Just yesterday we unleashed Phoromatic 1.0 with a horde of improvements to our remote test management system and as part of that introduced the Phoromatic Ubuntu Tracker, which benchmarks Ubuntu on a daily basis looking for performance regressions across multiple systems. Earlier today we then called out for benchmarking requests as what we should track next using our testing and execution framework (so far the likely contender is seeing how Wine's performance is evolving on a per-commit basis, but let us know what you think). Now to end out this week of announcements I have something else to share that's particularly interesting.

Last November I hinted that Windows support was coming to the Phoronix Test Suite and a month later I went on a sabbatical in Germany to focus on the Windows 7 support up-bringing to this GPLv3-licensed software. Since returning there's continued to be a monumental amount of work going into the Phoronix Test Suite that benefits not only the existing Linux, *BSD, OpenSolaris, and Mac OS X support, but the forthcoming Microsoft Windows support too. With that said, it's looking like within two or three weeks the Windows support within the Phoronix Test Suite will be fully functioning and ready for official use.

Soon: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.6, Oh My!


The heart of the Phoronix Test Suite, pts-core, will be fully compatible with Windows 7 (and should work fine on older versions such as Windows Vista and XP) and there should be at least a dozen (or more) test profiles that will seamlessly (and natively) work across our Linux / BSD / OpenSolaris / Mac OS X / Windows test spectrum. This means automated, highly reproducible tests across practically every major operating system. The support will continue to be refined going forward especially as we get closer to hitting Phoronix Test Suite 3.0, but April and May should be very exciting months.

Not only will the Phoronix Test Suite run on Windows, but features like Phoronix Global and Phoromatic will work on the Microsoft OS too, since we know of no other publicly available software (let alone open-source software) that provides the depth and automated testing feature set that is available from this Phoronix software stack. Windows may not be our favorite OS, but that's no reason to deprive those users from experiencing a robust benchmarking framework and letting them be exposed to more open-source software -- as after all, most of the tests within the Phoronix Test Suite use free software components as benchmarks. Also benefiting from this work will be the Wine project as new Windows test profiles should also function under Wine with the Phoronix Test Suite thanks to Cascading Test Profiles, a feature we introduced to pts-core more than one year ago.

Following this code push, you can expect a variety of interesting articles to appear on Phoronix.com. We will certainly be delivering benchmarks that compare the performance of Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.6 and a plethora of other tests (including multi-platform graphics driver benchmarks) that can now be easily and reliably delivered across operating systems in a manner that's reproducible by anyone. We will also be using a variety of hardware in this testing.

This Windows support will be part of the forthcoming Phoronix Test Suite 2.6 "Lyngen" release, but stay tuned for more announcements.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. A Walkthrough Of The New 32 System Open-Source Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  2. Habey MITX-6771: Mini-ITX Board With Quad-Core J1900 Bay Trail
  3. OCZ Vector 150 SSD On Linux
  4. Noctua i4 CPU Cooler: Great For Cooling High-End LGA-2011v3 CPUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Kaveri: Open-Source Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver
  2. 12-Way AMD Catalyst 14.12 vs. NVIDIA 346 Series Linux GPU Comparison
  3. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver Brings Mixed Results For Linux Users
  4. 6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison
Latest Linux News
  1. Raspberry Pi's Gallium3D Driver Could Now Run Significantly Faster
  2. CMake 3.1 Brings Windows Additions, Target Compile Feature
  3. KDE Applications 14.12 Released
  4. Fedora 21 Released For POWER & AArch64 Hardware
  5. Elasticsearch & wxPython 3 Proposed For Fedora 22
  6. The New SuperTuxKart Looks Better, But Can Cause GPU/Driver Problems
  7. GTK+ On Windows Now Supports OpenGL
  8. New Ruby Benchmarks On GCC vs. LLVM Clang Compilers
  9. Multi-Stream Transport 4K Monitors To Become Better Supported On Linux
  10. New Supertuxkart Beta Lands New Graphics Engine, Uses OpenGL 3.1+
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. XLennart: A Game For Systemd Haters With Nothing Better To Do
  2. Need some hand holding with upgrading xserver
  3. Ubuntu Developers Still Thinking What To Do About Adobe Flash Support
  4. Microsoft buying Mojang
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. Premium subscription "login" times out much faster than forum
  7. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Linux Driver Released -- Huge Update!
  8. Did Valve already get what they wanted from SteamOS? i.e. Win kernel + BigPicture DE