1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Gosh, Our Test Farm Already Finds Big Regression

Phoronix

Published on 10 December 2009 11:27 PM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Phoronix
12 Comments

Back in October we made it possible to autonomously find performance regressions in a project's code-base by leveraging the Phoronix Test Suite atop Git's bisect command. A new Phoronix Test Suite module was created that would automatically run a binary search on a defined code-base and keep running the specified test(s) on each revision and then traverse to the next using Git bisect until the lone commit causing the defined regression was located. In that article we demonstrated this module by finding the commit that caused a serious performance drop for EXT4 by default in the Linux 2.6.32 kernel. While this feature is great for finding a regression that occurred at some point in the past, with the Phoronix Test Suite you can find regressions nearly in real-time now that Phoromatic is available to the public.

Phoromatic is our enterprise-oriented remote test management software that makes it possible to routinely run any Phoronix Test Suite tests on a scheduled basis and everything continues to be carried out in a fully autonomous manner. Multiple test systems can also be controlled through the single web-based interface where the test results are then automatically uploaded to for easy viewing. Phoromatic makes it easy to build a benchmarking test farm whether you are just an individual or a company.

With Phoromatic churning along, the Phoronix Kernel Test Farm entered an operational state at the beginning of this month. With our test farm, the latest Linux kernel bits are automatically tested on a daily basis in an effort to track positive or negative performance changes.

There were no plans to then publicly unveil the new Phoronix Kernel Test Farm tracker web interface until the start of the new year once sufficient data has started to collect, but that has now changed. In less than two weeks of running the Phoronix Kernel Test Farm, our software has already latched on to yet another major, negative performance regression that is still present in the mainline tree and is poised to inhibit the performance of the Linux 2.6.33 kernel if it remains.

This Linux 2.6.33 performance regression is not minor, but in some tests is causing double digit changes. It looks like this regression has gone unnoticed by the stakeholders within the Linux kernel community, but now we are rushing to get this new public interface that exposes our kernel test farm to the public up and running. This should be live by next week, at which point the regression will be disclosed -- that is if the conventional Linux kernel testing methods don't prevail, which so far seems to be the case. The status quo is not sufficient if commits containing sizable regressions that can be easily spotted with real-world, automated tests are allowed to enter the mainline Linux kernel in the first place.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  2. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
  3. Linux 3.18 File-System Performance Minimally Changed But Possible Regressions
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D Is Catching Up & Sometimes Beating Catalyst On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. V2 Of KDBUS Published For Linux Kernel Review
  2. VirtualBox 4.3.20 Arrives, Still No Sign Of VirtualBox 4.4
  3. Scientific Linux 6.6 vs. Scientific Linux 7.0 Benchmarks
  4. Qualcomm Looks To Get Into The ARM Server Business
  5. HHVM 3.4 Adds New Features, Support
  6. More Radeon Driver Changes Queued For Linux 3.19
  7. Unigine 2.0 Alpha 2 Adds C# Support
  8. FFmpeg Is Returning To Ubuntu With 15.04 Release
  9. Linux Version Of Civilization: Beyond Earth Still Coming Along
  10. Yahoo To Become Default Search Provider For Firefox
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  2. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  3. Debian Init System Coupling Vote Results
  4. The Slides Announcing The New "AMDGPU" Kernel Driver
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  7. Ubuntu Developers Still Thinking What To Do About Adobe Flash Support
  8. How to get rid of Linux