1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

New X.Org Release Process Has Been Reached

X.Org

Published on 01 October 2009 04:24 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
21 Comments

Last week we talked about a new X.Org release process proposal for improving the consistency and quality of X Server releases through taking a number of relatively simple steps. Well, this week from XDS2009, a revised proposal has been agreed upon now making it policy for X Server 1.8 / X.Org 7.6 and later.

With this new process, there will be consistent six-month releases that should be very predictable. This is going to begin next Monday once X Server 1.7 is released, so hopefully X Server 1.8 will make it out in March, which would allow it to be pulled into the Q2'2010 round of distribution updates.

As part of this process, the master X Server Git repository is no longer open to all, but is only to the release manager. All X.Org developers should have their own X Server branch(es) and then make pull requests to the release manager if they want code to touch the mainline code-base.

The developers also want to pull the X.Org drivers back into the X Server core, which was done previously before their modularization, but they want to put the drivers back into core in order to come back to a more coherent API. This though will not be happening until early 2011 or so (around X Server 1.10).

Daniel Stone concludes his mailing list message detailing this new policy with, "Phoronix: Yes, we're really trying this time." Bravo! Let's hope this new policy really becomes a reality as these changes will surely benefit quite a number of users, distribution vendors, and developers.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Btrfs On 4 x Intel SSDs In RAID 0/1/5/6/10
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 On Ubuntu 14.10: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Driver Comparison
  2. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers On Ubuntu 14.10
  3. Ubuntu 14.10 Offers AMD Radeon Driver Performance Improvements
  4. Btrfs RAID: Linux 3.10 To Linux 3.18 Benchmarks
Latest Linux News
  1. Red Hat Software Collections 1.2 Adds GCC 4.9, Nginx 1.6
  2. GLAMOR Acceleration Continues To Be Cleaned Up
  3. Russia's Yandex Web Browser Finally Released For Linux
  4. Linux Kernel Finally Being Optimized For SSHDs
  5. GPU Profiling Support Lands In Mozilla Firefox
  6. Kubuntu 15.04 Will Use KDE's Plasma 5 By Default
  7. KDBUS Submitted For Review To The Mainline Linux Kernel
  8. An Intel-Based Ubuntu Touch Tablet Is Planning To Launch Soon
  9. MIAOW: An Open-Source GPU Design Based On AMD's Southern Islands
  10. X.Org Server 1.17 RC1 Released, Exciting For GLAMOR & Modesetting
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Is foolish currently develop in machine code, hexadecimal and assembly?
  2. How to get rid of Linux
  3. Reducing The CPU Usage In Mesa To Improve Performance
  4. Help diagnosing problems with a Readon HD 4670 on Mesa 10.3.2-1
  5. Advertisements On Phoronix
  6. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  7. Looking for a Open-Source AMD experienced Linux mentor
  8. Bad perfomance in gaming