New X.Org Release Process Has Been Reached

Posted by Michael Larabel on October 01, 2009

Last week we talked about a new X.Org release process proposal for improving the consistency and quality of X Server releases through taking a number of relatively simple steps. Well, this week from XDS2009, a revised proposal has been agreed upon now making it policy for X Server 1.8 / X.Org 7.6 and later.

With this new process, there will be consistent six-month releases that should be very predictable. This is going to begin next Monday once X Server 1.7 is released, so hopefully X Server 1.8 will make it out in March, which would allow it to be pulled into the Q2'2010 round of distribution updates.

As part of this process, the master X Server Git repository is no longer open to all, but is only to the release manager. All X.Org developers should have their own X Server branch(es) and then make pull requests to the release manager if they want code to touch the mainline code-base.

The developers also want to pull the X.Org drivers back into the X Server core, which was done previously before their modularization, but they want to put the drivers back into core in order to come back to a more coherent API. This though will not be happening until early 2011 or so (around X Server 1.10).

Daniel Stone concludes his mailing list message detailing this new policy with, "Phoronix: Yes, we're really trying this time." Bravo! Let's hope this new policy really becomes a reality as these changes will surely benefit quite a number of users, distribution vendors, and developers.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux Desktop Security Could Be A Whole Lot Better
  2. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces Feature Release
  3. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  4. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  5. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  6. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  7. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  8. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  9. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  10. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  11. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Openbenchmarking.org main page is damaged
  2. Xserver 1.14 support will arrive with Catalyst...
  3. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has...
  4. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  5. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX...
  6. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite