1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Properties For RandR 1.3 Discussed Again

X.Org

Published on 28 October 2008 07:48 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
2 Comments

RandR 1.3 has been in planning for some time as the first update to the Resize and Rotate extension since the prominent 1.2 release that added output hot-plugging support and other features. RandR 1.3 wasn't finished in time for X Server 1.5 / X.Org 7.4, but Keith Packard has called for it in the next X Server 1.6 release.

When the X.Org developers raided the Edinburgh Zoo for their X Developers' Summit in September, Keith had intended to close RandR 1.3 in roughly one month. It's late, but we're now approaching November and discussion surrounding the much talked about properties support for the RandR 1.3 protocol has been rejuvenated by Novell's Matthias Hopf.

Matthias is trying to set the standard properties for RandR 1.3. The known properties in his second draft include standard properties for EDID data, signal format, connector types, connector numbers, maximum bandwidth for the selected signal format, a list of all output and signal format pairs, clone list, and panning area.

The RandR 1.3 properties addition is described in the protocol specification as:

"Properties are used for output specific parameters, and for announcing static or rarely changing data. Announced data is typically immutable. Properties are also used for evaluating new parameters before adding them to the RandR protocol."


The discussion surrounding RandR 1.3 properties can be read on the X.Org mailing list. For those looking to learn how to use the command-line xrandr utility, check out A Newbie's Guide To RandR 1.2.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Btrfs On 4 x Intel SSDs In RAID 0/1/5/6/10
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 On Ubuntu 14.10: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA's Linux Driver Can Deliver Better OpenGL Performance Than Windows 8.1
  2. Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 With Intel HD Graphics
  3. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Driver Comparison
  4. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers On Ubuntu 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Steam Linux Usage Is Almost Back Up To 1.2%
  2. GCC's JIT Compiler Support Moves A Step Closer To Mainline
  3. Freescale's iMX DRM Driver Sees Big Changes
  4. Enlightenment's New Wayland Compositor Code Is Now Functional, Supports XDG-Shell
  5. Don't Use Fedora's Fedup Right Now Due To A Bug With Systemd
  6. AMD On Linux & Systemd Were Very Popular This Month
  7. Wine 1.7.30 Continues Work On DirectWrite & Offers Regedit Fixes
  8. Has The Sky Fallen? Qualcomm Contributes To Freedreno's DRM/KMS Driver
  9. Manjaro Works To Make Calamares A Distribution-Independent Installer
  10. DisplayLink USB 3.0 Support Sounds Like A Mess
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Civilization: Beyond Earth Overcoming Linux GPU Driver Problems
  2. How to get rid of Linux
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. Step by Step install of Latest Nvidia Driver Article Request
  5. Closed source to opensource
  6. What Would You Like To See Next?
  7. Is foolish currently develop in machine code, hexadecimal and assembly?
  8. Reducing The CPU Usage In Mesa To Improve Performance