Intel Reflects On Past Graphics Releases

Posted by Michael Larabel on November 11, 2008

Jesse Barnes, one of the developers within Intel's Open-Source Technology Center whose responsibilities largely deal with Intel's Linux graphics work, has shared some thoughts and statistics on past graphics-related releases. Jesse looked at the number of DRM commits to recent Linux kernel releases, a few thoughts on Mesa and xf86-video-intel releases, and the release history of the X Server.

With the DRM work, Jesse concludes "at a high level that would seem to indicate that we did a pretty poor job of keeping the upstream kernel up-to-date, at least until recently." This isn't too surprising considering Linus Torvalds had referred to Intel's initial GEM patches as untested crap and considering the amount of time it's taken for a GPU kernel memory manager to enter the mainline Linux kernel and that kernel mode-setting still hasn't entered the Linux kernel even though it's been around for many months now in varying stages.

The X Server release schedule has also been a mess with its time between releases varying greatly (need we mention X Server 1.4.1 Is Released, No Joke). Jesse proposes de-modularizing it by pulling the drivers back into the X Server module so that it will require driver developers to ensure the server is in a good shape, but of course that isn't a sentiment widely shared.

After checking out Jesse's blog post, you may also be interested in our articles on Contributors To The X Server and The People Behind Mesa.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite