1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Degrading Quality Of X.Org Releases?

X.Org

Published on 26 September 2007 12:13 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
8 Comments

On the X.Org mailing list, Alan Coopersmith had raised concerns over the release criteria for X11 and how with recent releases (namely X.Org 7.3), the de facto standard for making a release was far from being met. Alan, Sun's X engineer, had listed the release criteria as the blocker bug list being cleared, the complete tree/release modules being build-able on at least one platform, XTS successfully running on at least one platform, and the documentation being updated and then released. X.Org 7.3 was released eight days late and failed to fully meet any of the requirements -- some X.Org 7.3 driver packages didn't even build against the respective X server.

Alan Coopersmith's points are certainly valid, and in a rush to meet deadlines and push out software, the quality has lessened. But don't get the wrong impression, X.Org developers do work hard, are doing a great job, and that isn't to be discounted! This problem doesn't exclusively apply to the X.Org development community, but largely across the free software spectrum. To succeed, however, something must be done and we must push for quality-driven releases as we prepare for the next wave of Linux desktop users. We must have timed releases but at the same time we need to expect at least the same level of quality.

What are your thoughts on X.Org 7.3? How can open-source software releases be rejuvenated to prevent degradation? Share your thoughts in the Phoronix Forums.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Running Fedora 20 On Intel's Core i7 Haswell-E Platform
  2. A Tour Of The New Phoronix Office
  3. 7-Way Linux Desktop Gaming Comparison On Ubuntu 14.10
  4. Intel P-State vs. CPUFreq Benchmarks On The i7-5960X
Latest Linux News
  1. The Gestures Support Of GNOME 3.14
  2. Linux 3.17 Has Basic Support For The Xbox One Controller
  3. openSUSE 13.2 Beta Still Using Btrfs By Default, & KDE Plasma 5 For Testing
  4. GTK+ 3.14 Brings Much Better Wayland Support, Multi-Touch, New Theme
  5. DisplayPort Comes To USB's Type-C Connector
  6. NSS Updated On Ubuntu 12.04/14.04 To Allow Netflix Support
  7. Linux 3.17-rc6 Released; Linux 3.17 Final Might Come In One Week
  8. X.Org Server 1.16.1 Released
  9. Mesa Gets Closer To Having OpenGL 4.0 Tessellation Support
  10. Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. State of Nouveau now and in the near future?
  2. Uselessd: A Stripped Down Version Of Systemd
  3. Wasteland 2 Officially Launched Today, Including For Linux Gamers
  4. NVIDIA GTX 770/780 -works ?
  5. New stress testing utility for GPU's
  6. How to get Catalyst 14.4 working on Ubuntu 14.04
  7. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  8. X.Org Women Outreach Program Only Turns Up Two Applicants So Far