1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

The Degrading Quality Of X.Org Releases?

X.Org

Published on 26 September 2007 12:13 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
8 Comments

On the X.Org mailing list, Alan Coopersmith had raised concerns over the release criteria for X11 and how with recent releases (namely X.Org 7.3), the de facto standard for making a release was far from being met. Alan, Sun's X engineer, had listed the release criteria as the blocker bug list being cleared, the complete tree/release modules being build-able on at least one platform, XTS successfully running on at least one platform, and the documentation being updated and then released. X.Org 7.3 was released eight days late and failed to fully meet any of the requirements -- some X.Org 7.3 driver packages didn't even build against the respective X server.

Alan Coopersmith's points are certainly valid, and in a rush to meet deadlines and push out software, the quality has lessened. But don't get the wrong impression, X.Org developers do work hard, are doing a great job, and that isn't to be discounted! This problem doesn't exclusively apply to the X.Org development community, but largely across the free software spectrum. To succeed, however, something must be done and we must push for quality-driven releases as we prepare for the next wave of Linux desktop users. We must have timed releases but at the same time we need to expect at least the same level of quality.

What are your thoughts on X.Org 7.3? How can open-source software releases be rejuvenated to prevent degradation? Share your thoughts in the Phoronix Forums.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux News
  1. Btrfs In Linux 4.2 Brings Quota Updates, Many Fixes
  2. Latest Rumor Pegs Microsoft Wanting To Buy AMD
  3. The Next-Gen Phoronix Site Experience Is Almost Ready
  4. Exciting Features Merged So Far For The Linux 4.2 Kernel
  5. Mesa 10.6.1 Brings A Bug-Fix For Dota 2 Reborn
  6. DragonFlyBSD 4.2 Released: Brings Improved Graphics & New Compiler
  7. Wine-Staging 1.7.46 Improves The OS X Experience
  8. The State & Complications Of Porting The Unity Editor To Linux
  9. Libreboot Now Supports An AMD/ASUS Motherboard
  10. SafeStack Merged Into LLVM To Protect Against Stack Buffer Overflow Attacks
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. How KDE VDG Is Trying To Make Open-Source Software Beautiful
  2. Attempting To Try Out BCache On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
  3. CompuLab's Fitlet Is A Very Tiny, Fanless, Linux PC With AMD A10 Micro
  4. AMD A10-7870K Godavari: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Linux Drivers
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linus Is Looking Forward To Merging KDBUS, But Not Convinced By Performance
  2. Kubuntu 15.10 Could Be The End Of The Road
  3. NVIDIA Starts Supplying Open-Source Hardware Reference Headers
  4. KDBUS Won't Be Pushed Until The Linux 4.3 Kernel
  5. Linux 4.2 Kernel Gets Port To New Processor Architecture
  6. EXT4 Has Many Cleanups & Fixes For Linux 4.2
  7. The Staging Pull For Linux 4.2: "Big, Really Big"
  8. SteamOS "Brewmaster" Is Valve's New Debian 8.1 Based Version