1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Degrading Quality Of X.Org Releases?

X.Org

Published on 26 September 2007 12:13 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in X.Org
8 Comments

On the X.Org mailing list, Alan Coopersmith had raised concerns over the release criteria for X11 and how with recent releases (namely X.Org 7.3), the de facto standard for making a release was far from being met. Alan, Sun's X engineer, had listed the release criteria as the blocker bug list being cleared, the complete tree/release modules being build-able on at least one platform, XTS successfully running on at least one platform, and the documentation being updated and then released. X.Org 7.3 was released eight days late and failed to fully meet any of the requirements -- some X.Org 7.3 driver packages didn't even build against the respective X server.

Alan Coopersmith's points are certainly valid, and in a rush to meet deadlines and push out software, the quality has lessened. But don't get the wrong impression, X.Org developers do work hard, are doing a great job, and that isn't to be discounted! This problem doesn't exclusively apply to the X.Org development community, but largely across the free software spectrum. To succeed, however, something must be done and we must push for quality-driven releases as we prepare for the next wave of Linux desktop users. We must have timed releases but at the same time we need to expect at least the same level of quality.

What are your thoughts on X.Org 7.3? How can open-source software releases be rejuvenated to prevent degradation? Share your thoughts in the Phoronix Forums.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
  2. SilverStone Precision PS10
  3. ASRock Z97 Extreme6
  4. Nouveau Re-Clocking Is Way Faster, Shows Much Progress For Open-Source NVIDIA
Latest Linux Articles
  1. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  2. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  3. Preview: Benchmarking CentOS 7.0 & Scientific Linux 7.0
  4. Linux 3.16 File-System Tests On A Hard Drive
Latest Linux News
  1. The Linux Kernel Bang-Bang Thermal Governor Is Banging
  2. NVIDIA Releases K1-Powered Shield Tablet & Controller
  3. Xen Project Announces Mirage OS 2.0
  4. Canonical Community Team Changes Announced For Ubuntu
  5. Raspberry Pi B+ ARM Debian Benchmarks
  6. Mozilla Unleashes Firefox 31 Web Browser
  7. GCC 5.0 Is Expected Next Year
  8. PHP5's Successor Might Be PHP7
  9. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right
  10. AMDKFD Driver Still Evolving For Open-Source HSA On Linux
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right
  2. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  3. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. AMD Publishes Open-Source Linux HSA Kernel Driver
  6. KDE Plasma 5 Officially Released
  7. Vote For GOG To Make Galaxy Open Source
  8. TSC Problem on Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (rev 1.1)