1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel Celeron N2820: ACPI CPUfreq vs. P-State Scaling

Intel

Published on 03 June 2014 03:00 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Intel
5 Comments

To complement the recent ACPI CPUfreq vs. Intel P-State Scaling With Linux 3.15 testing that was done using an Intel Core i7 Ivy Bridge Extreme Edition system, here's some similar tests done using a low-power Intel Celeron N2820 "Bay Trail" SoC within the Intel NUC.

For reference purposes from the Intel N2820 NUC when using the Linux 3.15 kernel loaded on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64-bit, I compared the performance of the ACPI CPUfreq and Intel P-State CPU frequency scaling drivers. With the P-State driver I tested only with the performance governor as the powersave governor locked up the system. With ACPI CPUfreq I tested the Celeron N2820 with the powersave, performance, conservative, and ondemand scaling governors.


Read the earlier Phoronix article for more background information on this testing along with some power consumption comparison numbers, etc. To see the results, all of the system information and benchmark results in full via the Phoronix Test Suite are hosted on OpenBenchmarking.org via 1405297-KH-INTELNUC248.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  3. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  4. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
  2. The Most Energy Efficient Radeon GPU For AMD Linux Gaming
  3. 20-Way Radeon Comparison With Open-Source Graphics For Steam On Linux Gaming
  4. Preview: OS X 10.10 Yosemite vs. Ubuntu Linux GPU Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. Enlightenment E19 RC3 Shows Off The New Wayland Compositor
  2. Metro Redux Is Going To Require OpenGL 4.x On Linux
  3. Jailhouse v0.1 Released As A Basic Hypervisor For Linux
  4. Google's Chromebook "Samus" Now Supported By Coreboot
  5. Chrome 38 Now In Beta With Exciting Advancements
  6. Ubuntu's Utopic Unicorn 14.10 Beta 1 Released
  7. Genode OS 14.08 Has New GUI Architecture, Pluggable VFS
  8. Another Intel Linux Power Regression Is Being Investigated
  9. DNF Makes It A Step Closer To Replacing Yum On Fedora
  10. OS Battle: Linux Takes 1.7% Desktop Marketshare
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Canonical Joined The Khronos Group To Help Mir/Wayland Drivers
  2. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  3. Radeon HD5670 and Ubuntu 14.04
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  6. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  7. OC capability - Intel Core i5 4690K & Biostar Hi-Fi Z97WE
  8. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage