1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Phoronix Test Suite 5.2-Khanino Is Nearly Ready

Phoronix

Published on 29 May 2014 12:05 AM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Phoronix
Comment On This Article

The fourth development milestone release of Phoronix Test Suite 5.2-Khanino is now available.

Phoronix Test Suite 5.2 is being prepared for release next week Thursday, 5 June, in celebration of Phoronix.com turning ten years old and it being six years since the Phoronix Test Suite 1.0 public debut.

Phoronix Test Suite 5.2 Milestone 4 is coming just one week after the last Khanino milestone but is packing a fair amount of changes:

- There's many graphing improvements. In particular, box plot charts are used in some circumstances for better visualizing the test data. The result overview graph has also been improved and various other graphing improvements.

Phoronix Test Suite 5.2-Khanino Is Nearly Ready


- The new Phoromatic code built into the Phoronix Test Suite code-base is getting into good shape for its premiere in the 5.2 release as an early tech preview / beta product. Read more in PTS 5.2 M2: Build A New Test Farm In Minutes and a preview of the next-gen interface.

- A new auto-sort-result-file sub-command.

- Various other minor improvements.

The latest release of our open-source, cross-platform automated benchmarking software can be found at Phoronix-Test-Suite.com. Any last minute patches, feedback, etc are welcome for ensuring 5.2-Khanino is in great shape. Commercial support is available and the Phoronix Test Suite benchmarking code is hosted on GitHub.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Preview Of AMD Radeon R9 290 Hawaii Open-Source Performance
  2. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  3. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  4. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  5. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  6. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  7. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  8. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  9. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  10. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  2. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  3. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  4. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign