1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

CPUFreq Ondemand Could Be Faster, Use Less Power With Linux 3.17

Linux Kernel

Published on 22 July 2014 08:11 PM EDT
Written by Michael Larabel in Linux Kernel
14 Comments

Improvements to the CPUfreq ondemand governor could lead to faster performance in low to medium workloads with the Linux 3.17 kernel while also consuming less power overall.

Queued up today for merging into the Linux 3.17 kernel in a few weeks time are two patches that for the CPUfreq driver's ondemand governor will eliminate a "deadband effect" in low workloads. Stratos Karafotis -- the author of these patches -- explained, "This patchset changes slightly the calculation of target frequency to eliminate the deadband effect (explained in patch 2 changelog) that it seems to slow down the CPU in low and medium loads."

Tests were done by the developer of the patches and the benchmarks were carried out with the Phoronix Test Suite on an Intel Core i7 machine. With workloads ranging from the Linux kernel compilation to Apache to FFmpeg the energy savings were up to 4% while the performance was up to 6% faster with CPUfreq ondemand. Those details can be found in this mailing list post.

Rafael J. Wysocki, the Intel employee that serves as the ACPI/PM subsystem maintainer for the Linux kernel, queued the patches today for merging into Linux 3.17. Below is the patch message that describes this CPUfreq ondemand change for eliminating the deadband effect.
Currently, ondemand calculates the target frequency proportional to load using the formula:

Target frequency = C * load
where C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100

Though, in many cases, the minimum available frequency is pretty high and the above calculation introduces a dead band from load 0 to 100 * policy->cpuinfo.min_freq / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq where the target frequency is always calculated to less than policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and the minimum frequency is selected.

For example: on Intel i7-3770 @ 3.4GHz the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 1600000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 3400000 (without turbo). Thus, the CPU starts to scale up at a load above 47. On quad core 1500MHz Krait the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 384000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 1512000. Thus, the CPU starts to scale at load above 25.

Change the calculation of target frequency to eliminate the above effect using the formula:

Target frequency = A + B * load
where A = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and
B = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq - policy->cpuinfo->min_freq) / 100

This will map load values 0 to 100 linearly to cpuinfo.min_freq to cpuinfo.max_freq.

Also, use the CPUFREQ_RELATION_C in __cpufreq_driver_target to select the closest frequency in frequency_table. This is necessary to avoid selection of minimum frequency only when load equals to 0. It will also help for selection of frequencies using a more 'fair' criterion.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Btrfs On 4 x Intel SSDs In RAID 0/1/5/6/10
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 On Ubuntu 14.10: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA's Linux Driver Can Deliver Better OpenGL Performance Than Windows 8.1
  2. Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 With Intel HD Graphics
  3. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Driver Comparison
  4. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers On Ubuntu 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. AMD On Linux & Systemd Were Very Popular This Month
  2. Wine 1.7.30 Continues Work On DirectWrite & Offers Regedit Fixes
  3. Has The Sky Fallen? Qualcomm Contributes To Freedreno's DRM/KMS Driver
  4. Manjaro Works To Make Calamares A Distribution-Independent Installer
  5. DisplayLink USB 3.0 Support Sounds Like A Mess
  6. PulseAudio Gains A Native Bluetooth Headset Backend
  7. X.Org Foundation Decides On Its Women Outreach Project
  8. GTK+ 3.16's New GtkGLArea Widget Gets Improved
  9. X.Org Server 1.17 ABI Bumped
  10. Fedora 21 Beta To Be Released Next Week
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. How to get rid of Linux
  2. Closed source to opensource
  3. What Would You Like To See Next?
  4. Is foolish currently develop in machine code, hexadecimal and assembly?
  5. Reducing The CPU Usage In Mesa To Improve Performance
  6. Help diagnosing problems with a Readon HD 4670 on Mesa 10.3.2-1
  7. Advertisements On Phoronix
  8. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC