1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Some PNaCl LLVM Patches Might Make Writing LLVM Back-Ends Easier

Compiler

Published on 05 March 2014 01:25 AM EST
Written by Michael Larabel in Compiler
Comment On This Article

Some work from Google's Portable Native Client (PNaCl) work might be pushed upstream in LLVM as it benefits the EmScripten JavaScript back-end and other interesting use-cases.

Google's Native Client is the company's sandboxing technology for running native x86/ARM code in a sandbox from their Chrome web browser and ChromeOS. Portable Natice Client applications are compiled to a subset of the LLVM IR bytecode. While the code is available and under a BSD license, Google isn't leveraging upstream LLVM in their work. Google though is a big contributor to LLVM in general and the PNaCl team is now attempting to push some PNaCl IR passes back into upstream LLVM.

What makes these IR passes interesting and worth mentioning is that they appear to be useful simplification/lowering passes that can ease development of new LLVM back-ends, especially for interesting use-cases like EmScripten with compiling out to JavaScript for the web browser. These IR simplification passes end up simplifying LLVM IR from complex features into simpler features. With a reduced set of IR to target, it's easier for developers to make new back-ends and provides a more stable subset of LLVM IR. These PNaCl passes are modular and simplify calling conventions and module-level lowering.

Mark Seaborn of the PNaCl team at Google has proposed upstreaming this work (just these passes and not mainlining all of their PNaCl LLVM code) to help other new potential back-ends or at the very least centering the work currently done by PNaCl and EmScripten.

Alon Zakai added additional commentary about these patches in EmScripten's new back-end use-case, "It made writing the backend much easier than it otherwise would have been...I think the shared thing in these examples is that LLVM IR is very nice to work with, and there are some situations where you're using it and you have a reason to convert it into something else, and you want to do that in as _simple_ a way as possible as opposed to generating the most _optimal_ results. The PNaCl IR simplification passes are in my opinion a big help there."

Developers at Apple and Google, among other contributors, seem to be interested in this work for the potential wins. However, there is some concern amongst LLVM developers (including by Chris Lattner) over maintenance -- though Google's PNaCl team has claimed they will support it -- of these passes and not having any in-tree back-ends at the moment that utilize the passes (or any test cases right now for stressing them), but if this code pans out to be interesting and helpful, hopefully it will manage to make it in for LLVM 3.5.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. A Walkthrough Of The New 32 System Open-Source Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  2. Habey MITX-6771: Mini-ITX Board With Quad-Core J1900 Bay Trail
  3. OCZ Vector 150 SSD On Linux
  4. Noctua i4 CPU Cooler: Great For Cooling High-End LGA-2011v3 CPUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Kaveri: Open-Source Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver
  2. 12-Way AMD Catalyst 14.12 vs. NVIDIA 346 Series Linux GPU Comparison
  3. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver Brings Mixed Results For Linux Users
  4. 6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison
Latest Linux News
  1. LLVM 3.6 Will Be Branched Next Month
  2. Opera Browser Puts Out Linux Updates For The Holidays
  3. GNOME Shell 3.15.3 Adds Support For High-Contrast Themes
  4. Linux 3.19: ThinkPad Muting Redone, New Dell Backlight Support, Acer Is Banging
  5. KVM Drops Support For IA64 While Adding Various x86 Improvements
  6. GCC 4.8.4 Officially Released
  7. FSF's High Priority Project List Now Has A Committee
  8. Details On Using OpenACC & GPUs With GCC
  9. Ubuntu 15.04 Alpha 1 For Its Various Flavors
  10. Git 2.2.1 Released To Fix Critical Security Issue
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. XLennart: A Game For Systemd Haters With Nothing Better To Do
  2. The New SuperTuxKart Looks Better, But Can Cause GPU/Driver Problems
  3. Debian init discussion in Phoenix Wright format
  4. FPS capped on Linux (AMD fglrx drivers)
  5. Are there an app using HSA ?
  6. Bench specific mount point
  7. Tool for measuring FPS in games
  8. Need some hand holding with upgrading xserver